Saturday, April 28, 2012

NYT Columnist Admits He Got Conned by Stop and Go Fed Money Printing

Well,  NYT columnist Joe Nocera  doesn't realize it was the stop and go Fed money printing that did it to him, but he now realizes he was clueless in general about investing. He writes:
My 60th birthday is less than a week and a half away, and if there is one thing I can say with certainty it’s that 60 is not the new 50.

My body creaks and groans. My eyes aren’t what they used to be. I don’t sleep as soundly as I did just a few years ago. Lately, I’ve been seeing a lot of doctors, just to make sure everything still more or less works.

I’ve also found myself with a sudden urge to get my house in order — just, you know, in case. Insurance, wills, that sort of thing. Sixty is when you stop pretending you’re going to live forever. You’re officially old. Or at least old-ish.

The only thing I haven’t dealt with on my to-do checklist is retirement planning. The reason is simple: I’m not planning to retire. More accurately, I can’t retire. My 401(k) plan, which was supposed to take care of my retirement, is in tatters.

Like millions of other aging baby boomers, I first began putting money into a tax-deferred retirement account a few years after they were legislated into existence in the late 1970s. The great bull market, which began in 1982, was just gearing up. As a young journalist, I couldn’t afford to invest a lot of money, but my account grew as the market rose, and the bull market gave me an inflated sense of my investing skills.

I became such an enthusiast of the new investing culture that I wrote my first book, in the mid-1990s, about what I called “the democratization of money.” It was only right, I argued, that the little guy have the same access to the markets as the wealthy. In the book, I didn’t make much of the decline of pensions. After all, we were in the middle of the tech bubble by then. What fun!

The bull market ended with the bursting of that bubble in 2000. My tech-laden portfolio was cut in half. A half-dozen years later, I got divorced, cutting my 401(k) in half again. A few years after that, I bought a house that needed some costly renovations. Since my retirement account was now hopelessly inadequate for actual retirement, I reasoned that I might as well get some use out of the money while I could. So I threw another chunk of my 401(k) at the renovation. That’s where I stand today.
The Fed will suck you in and screw you every time. Only the banksters will be bailed out.

1 comment:

  1. Bob, in that same column, a "behavioral economist" that Nocera interviewed, said, "The 401(k),” she concluded, “is a failed experiment. It is time to rethink it.”

    As you have noted many times,the reason it is a "failed experiment" is because of GOVERNMENT INTERVENTIONISM!

    It is NOT a "failed experiment," but a victim of criminal government-manipulation of money, private economic matters, and private property!

    ReplyDelete