It's getting positively bizarre over at Cato Shrugged. The latest is a David Kirby column discussing how much of the libertarian vote Mitt Romney can gain. There's an element in the article of cheering on a libertarian vote for Romney, with the implication that Romney is a libertarian on some issues. Like what issues David?
More bizarre is that Kirby links to a an article by The Blaze, which quotes top Cato shrugger David Boaz, among others. Noteworthy in all these posts, commentaries and quotes is that Romney is never identified as the major league warmonger that he is. That is, how does one match the concept warmonger with the libertarian non-aggression principle?