tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post1859675690268614635..comments2024-02-13T02:39:22.756-05:00Comments on EconomicPolicyJournal.com: Paul Krugman Exposes Milton Friedman (Thanks to Ron Paul)Robert Wenzelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14296920597416905488noreply@blogger.comBlogger26125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-71596637771067679582013-09-15T02:07:30.732-04:002013-09-15T02:07:30.732-04:00Great analysis!
A "if I'm wrong it's...Great analysis!<br /><br />A "if I'm wrong it's because people don't act the way that I think they should" exposure of the intellectual mindset of these technocratic bastards. <br /><br />FitzAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-34706793271477891492013-09-14T21:12:06.449-04:002013-09-14T21:12:06.449-04:00http://www.lewrockwell.com/2006/11/ron-paul/the-la...http://www.lewrockwell.com/2006/11/ron-paul/the-land-of-the-free-lunch/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-12848523260385339642012-05-04T19:23:31.979-04:002012-05-04T19:23:31.979-04:00This article (and the many people attacking Krugma...This article (and the many people attacking Krugman in the comments section) seem quite hypocritical to me. I have not seen any numbers nor any proper refutations of Krugman's policies. No one has disproven that Friedman favoured quantitative easing.<br />Somehow, despite all of the above, people are saying Krugman is a political elitist with no facts on his side. Strange, isn't it?Dr. Shannonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00046631898338805969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-86621854667547138372011-11-09T07:07:33.656-05:002011-11-09T07:07:33.656-05:00Actually, Keynes said that to Hayek, not Friedman....Actually, Keynes said that to Hayek, not Friedman. I doubt Friedman knew Keynes personally.Practicalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-5580741383068768102011-11-09T06:27:43.946-05:002011-11-09T06:27:43.946-05:00Friedman knew Keynes and said that during Keyenes ...Friedman knew Keynes and said that during Keyenes last days he was very worried that people were starting to distort his theories on defecit spending. In other words, he was worried a moron like Krugman would win a Nobel Prize.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-61315893513966412912011-01-17T13:51:58.579-05:002011-01-17T13:51:58.579-05:00I think the more pressing issue is not that Friedm...I think the more pressing issue is not that Friedman looks "left-wing" compared to Ron Paul or Murray Rothbard, but that he looks "right-wing" compared to the Krugmanites that perpetually control US monetary policy.Raynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-38585069036873486802011-01-17T09:35:08.870-05:002011-01-17T09:35:08.870-05:00Paul Krugman is a childish little loser who demand...Paul Krugman is a childish little loser who demands that everyone else live for him (What else is a Liberal?). This psychopath supports government violence in order to make everyone do as he wants and give up everything that they work for. Paul Krugam is a violent little mugger yet he is to cowardly to mug other people himself. He is like the weak little loser on the playground who befriends the Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-40827877110206453212011-01-16T13:35:53.215-05:002011-01-16T13:35:53.215-05:00I think most Americans understand that Nobel and t...I think most Americans understand that Nobel and the UN are flled with stupid and corrupt parasites (aka, Infantile Terrorists aka, Socialists) and what they do is all about feeling not like the losers that they are but feeling powerful by using political violence to enslaving everyone on Earth.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-60169575429400152032011-01-16T06:23:51.019-05:002011-01-16T06:23:51.019-05:00Cannon asks if MF can be labelled a "neoliber...Cannon asks if MF can be labelled a "neoliberal". Canon is of course right. I called MF a "Right Progressive" because I wanted to illustrate the whole Progressive Era technocrat angle. <br /><br />I suppose we do get into the never ending argument about what 'liberal' means here, and generally speaking the social democrats Americans call 'liberals' ain't earth that washttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03635503399458271477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-79479930525355494102011-01-15T21:56:04.083-05:002011-01-15T21:56:04.083-05:00On one issue, however, Ron Paul and Friedman agree...On one issue, however, Ron Paul and Friedman agree: the Fed should be abolished.<br /><br />See this video, in Friedman's own words:<br />"My first preference would be to abolish the Federal Reserve."<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL3FT0O4kYgBarking Catnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-92166036674169053952011-01-15T18:57:27.846-05:002011-01-15T18:57:27.846-05:00Why did the violent socialist parasites on the Nob...Why did the violent socialist parasites on the Nobel Committee give a prize to Krugman? Oh, I think I answered that.BarryOnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-53882190975252715462011-01-15T18:10:02.528-05:002011-01-15T18:10:02.528-05:00Democracy is war between the producers and the par...Democracy is war between the producers and the parasites...Krugman is a high-ranking officer (Parasitical Elite) of Team Parasite and is therefore not fit to live civil society. Paul Krugman is the equivalent of a Rapist, Tapework, or Smallpox virus.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-64171835176877704382011-01-15T16:00:00.109-05:002011-01-15T16:00:00.109-05:00Anonymous is right. The Nobel peace prize was awar...Anonymous is right. The Nobel peace prize was awarded to Obama. The Socialist Party dominated Norweigian parliament awarded it to Obama, essentially for just getting elected. It was interesting to note Obama's acceptance speech. He couldn't not accept it, a refusal would essentially eliminate all chance of ever getting it again. But he basically acknowledged he didn't deserve it in earth that washttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03635503399458271477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-31519037356955221692011-01-15T13:54:52.632-05:002011-01-15T13:54:52.632-05:00Does Friedman recant here:
http://www.fff.org/free...Does Friedman recant here:<br />http://www.fff.org/freedom/0299b.aspSam Grovehttp://www.kogagrove.org/samsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-48530439674213338382011-01-15T13:44:32.258-05:002011-01-15T13:44:32.258-05:00@ earth that was
Would it be fair to call Milton ...@ earth that was<br /><br />Would it be fair to call Milton Friedman a "neoliberal"?Cannonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13360634985029911156noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-81415626621945942162011-01-15T12:42:42.623-05:002011-01-15T12:42:42.623-05:00Didn't the Nobel committee present Obama a pie...Didn't the Nobel committee present Obama a piece prize just days before he ordered mass-murder in the mideast? The Nobel psychopaths are even more stupid and violent that the UN parasites.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-84343389879595547172011-01-15T11:10:06.386-05:002011-01-15T11:10:06.386-05:00What a great Krugman article. For too long, we...What a great Krugman article. For too long, we've heard things like "we tried free markets, we listened to Milton Friedman, and look what we got." Thanks to Krugman for showing this to be a lie.Puzzledhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12866127197554237039noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-70688464448274304402011-01-15T10:01:26.618-05:002011-01-15T10:01:26.618-05:00So...How's that Democracy thing working out fo...So...How's that Democracy thing working out for you? The majority in any area are feeble-mined and slave-owner-wannabes like Krugman, Pelosi, Reid, and Obama can easily get them to be their slaves. Voting morons along with Parasites like Krugman is the reason why Dumbocrazy always fails...The parasites overwhelm the producers...Always.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-35473276334317317822011-01-15T09:35:41.432-05:002011-01-15T09:35:41.432-05:00"we see proof that Krugman is not an economis..."we see proof that Krugman is not an economist, but rather a political operative"<br /><br />Agreed! I figured this out years ago...Before the violent little boy won a Nobel.<br /><br />Can you imagine the typical "character" of the Nobel committee?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-36945473354942035662011-01-15T09:31:14.851-05:002011-01-15T09:31:14.851-05:00Just remember...Every time you pay a tax you are s...Just remember...Every time you pay a tax you are supporting criminal-minded parasites like Paul Krugman.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-19051408524343824282011-01-15T09:18:40.674-05:002011-01-15T09:18:40.674-05:00The original "Progressives" were general...The original "Progressives" were generally in favor of rule by experts. They were in short advocates of technocracy. They generally opposed popularism, democratic rough and tumble and any 'non expert' deference to "irrational authorities", like religion, custom, tradition or 'common sense'. <br /><br />So Krugman's criticism of "morality" is part earth that washttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03635503399458271477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-12974856374184308252011-01-15T08:52:29.382-05:002011-01-15T08:52:29.382-05:00Little Paulie Krugman is just a bratty parasite wh...Little Paulie Krugman is just a bratty parasite who holds government violence as a high ideal. This filthy maggot has the character of a 12 year old brat combined with the mind of Joey Stalin.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-5596423734006654652011-01-15T06:31:12.175-05:002011-01-15T06:31:12.175-05:00Once again, we see proof that Krugman is not an ec...Once again, we see proof that Krugman is not an economist, but rather a political operative. He won the Nobel precisely because of his political commentary, as the Swedes and Norwegians were on a "We're against all things Bush" campaign, which culminated in Obama getting the "Peace Prize."<br /><br />You notice that he does not address the issue at all. Instead he is William L. Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01802990642236807359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-56786749129202682782011-01-14T22:28:34.190-05:002011-01-14T22:28:34.190-05:00Funny, but in my (luckily) long life, I've com...Funny, but in my (luckily) long life, I've come to the conclusion that what is moral is also "technocratically" advantageous.<br /><br />Instant Kharma, if you will...<br />(and yea, I prefer the older spelling thank you very much)Capn Mikenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-16987056847699601702011-01-14T19:08:08.440-05:002011-01-14T19:08:08.440-05:00Oh and one more thing. Where does Paul Krugman dra...Oh and one more thing. Where does Paul Krugman draw the line on morality? Certainly he wouldn't advocate genocide or war simply because he thought it might lead to greater total economic prosperity or more economic equality (or whatever it is, economically, that he claims he is concerned with), would he?<br /><br />So what's the deal, Paulie, when is it okay and when is it not okay to be Taylor Conanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18270678440957992085noreply@blogger.com