tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post4692594656778517015..comments2024-02-13T02:39:22.756-05:00Comments on EconomicPolicyJournal.com: The Coming Trump Trade ShockRobert Wenzelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14296920597416905488noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-66609185575328617472016-12-31T12:00:53.999-05:002016-12-31T12:00:53.999-05:00Free trade "lifts all boats". These agre...Free trade "lifts all boats". These agreements have only "lifted" Crony boats on all sides. "Free trade" is another fake news story. <br /><br />NAFTA apparently lifted some Mexican boats more than for Mom and Pop Yankee, understandably, but it didn't hurt zwall Street zillion Aires. Crony trade deals. <br /><br />Tariffs at least are in the open. Consider that Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-11695503697733447782016-12-25T21:55:49.206-05:002016-12-25T21:55:49.206-05:00http://www.polyconomics.com/ssu/ssu-030523.htm
Th...http://www.polyconomics.com/ssu/ssu-030523.htm<br /><br />The WSJ carried a better version of this article in their 50th Anniversary of the the Crash Series, complete with Side-Bar Story. (I have a yellowed original, scanned, available on request, RW.)<br /><br />A few weeks ago, I mentioned that the Wavers were at a Verification Moment with the 5-of-5-of-5-of... The Wanniski version of Supply Charleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05417810805625984670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-79640084757627683452016-12-25T19:30:42.387-05:002016-12-25T19:30:42.387-05:00Trade is one of the few areas where Krugman has ac...Trade is one of the few areas where Krugman has actually been decent.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11968441656658845395noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-85509987985602791882016-12-25T15:18:11.828-05:002016-12-25T15:18:11.828-05:00I'm just wondering. Are you saying we are now ...I'm just wondering. Are you saying we are now supposed to start believing Krugman now that a conservative (almost) in office has given him the leeway to marginally approach the truth? He hasn't done enough to utterly discredit himself in the last couple years? The fact that he has had to completely change positions on issues like infrastructure spending based solely on the outcome of theAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16807090975131842483noreply@blogger.com