tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post97005942982630630..comments2024-02-13T02:39:22.756-05:00Comments on EconomicPolicyJournal.com: OUTRAGE: If Only Walter Block Was Governor of New JerseyRobert Wenzelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14296920597416905488noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-76661713192243038332014-02-03T19:17:15.291-05:002014-02-03T19:17:15.291-05:00...crickets again. Shocking....crickets again. Shocking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-66039582916904690572014-02-02T22:51:45.588-05:002014-02-02T22:51:45.588-05:00LOL Mr. Wenzel. You call someone a criminal and re...LOL Mr. Wenzel. You call someone a criminal and refuse to say what crime someone has committed. You refuse to discuss how this "ciminal" violates the NAP.<br />http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2014/01/the-criminals-case-against-intellectual.html<br /><br />That is sloppy my friend. I'll be shocked if you post this comment since you dodged these subjects in your post and in Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-2918108111511043752014-02-02T16:30:27.589-05:002014-02-02T16:30:27.589-05:00"The NYT has not committed an act of aggressi..."The NYT has not committed an act of aggression against Block. "<br /><br />Not withstanding Dr. Block's opinion on "reputation", I personally think that the NYT's has committed an act of aggression.<br /><br />I know my opinion flys in the face of some big thinkers within the movement, but very simply I see that the NYT's article as a form of fraud and the damagesNick Badalamentihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14015961786370759940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-45600030381865515232014-02-02T15:38:30.401-05:002014-02-02T15:38:30.401-05:00You are correct that Walter has no standing from a...You are correct that Walter has no standing from a principled NAP position to sue NYT. I am not sure why Walter even brought it up as an option. That said, your initial comment did not lay out your objection to a suit. You merely stated that Block wrote in defense of libel and slander without stating your objection, leaving completely open why you made the point, as if Block's objection to Robert Wenzelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14296920597416905488noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-81748918977426855092014-02-02T14:53:57.062-05:002014-02-02T14:53:57.062-05:00Actually its a legitimate question. Block argues, ...Actually its a legitimate question. Block argues, and I agree, that your reputation exists in the mind of others. You have no property rights in other people's thoughts.<br /><br />What would block sue for? Money? A written apology/correction? The NYT has not infringed on Block's property rights. The NYT has not committed an act of aggression against Block. (And no, I am by no means Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-55753290928504961252014-02-02T14:37:15.486-05:002014-02-02T14:37:15.486-05:00Yeah right, Wenzel caught you misrepresenting Bloc...Yeah right, Wenzel caught you misrepresenting Block. READ YOUR COMMENT AGAIN. And now you attack Wenzel, instead of correcting your error like a man.Stanleynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-3190740528180346822014-02-02T14:06:05.418-05:002014-02-02T14:06:05.418-05:00Jeez, it was a question. You read the hostility in...Jeez, it was a question. You read the hostility into it, none was intended. But thats not surprising given your history. You are impossible to listen to/read when you disagree with someone. Childish is a severe understatement.<br /><br />I am honestly wondering if suing is compatible with what he has written given that his reputation exists in the thoughts/minds of other. Its a legitimate Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-72412245987433518372014-02-02T12:59:28.251-05:002014-02-02T12:59:28.251-05:00You are as bad as NYT. He defended them in the sen...You are as bad as NYT. He defended them in the sense that he said that the libeler and the slanderer are not committing crimes and that they should be free to say whatever they want. He did not, however, say he was in favor of committing libel or slander.Robert Wenzelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14296920597416905488noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-34914100099280408752014-02-02T11:43:04.720-05:002014-02-02T11:43:04.720-05:00I'm sorry, didn't Block defend the libeler...I'm sorry, didn't Block defend the libeler and slanderer in his book Defending the Undefendable?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-6896637575892298732014-02-02T08:30:52.780-05:002014-02-02T08:30:52.780-05:00We still pick cotton and sing songs. Slavery is al...We still pick cotton and sing songs. Slavery is alive and well through the terms have changed. The slaver now calls himself a government official, the slave is known as a citizen. The involuntary extraction of the fruits of ones labor happens every day. We haven't abolished slavery at all, they only give us the choice of which slave master gets to own us every 4 years. Dr. King we are not &awakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08780156753223873571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-1591630525672173732014-02-02T03:38:02.897-05:002014-02-02T03:38:02.897-05:00I am convinced that there are government moles in ...I am convinced that there are government moles in the NYT doing the bidding of the CIA, this sort of smear is not something a reasonable person would do, even if they were ideologically opposed to a guy like Walter Block, this has government propaganda written all over it.KJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13151760194316002691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-50574222927160863352014-02-02T03:01:14.207-05:002014-02-02T03:01:14.207-05:00I sent an email to the ombudsman and editor asking...I sent an email to the ombudsman and editor asking for a correction. RDF2https://www.blogger.com/profile/14340534647561133098noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-56304639861274700262014-02-01T23:30:31.137-05:002014-02-01T23:30:31.137-05:00The good news is that the "Toilet Paper of Re...The good news is that the "Toilet Paper of Record" (according to Gerald Celente) is on the way out. Its days are numbered. Stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13156269157955500129noreply@blogger.com