tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post1046186857320828330..comments2024-02-13T02:39:22.756-05:00Comments on EconomicPolicyJournal.com: One Man's View on the Ventura vs. Wenzel Debate on Gay Rights and DiscriminationRobert Wenzelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14296920597416905488noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-47480078236932737632014-03-24T22:53:52.638-04:002014-03-24T22:53:52.638-04:00That should have read Pathological Equalist. That should have read Pathological Equalist. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-25110367646830005932014-03-24T21:48:08.188-04:002014-03-24T21:48:08.188-04:00JW: Troll.JW: Troll.Mikehttp://www.antiwar.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-60942579565009690572014-03-24T20:38:51.760-04:002014-03-24T20:38:51.760-04:00Any individual that has worked in sales or been in...Any individual that has worked in sales or been in the dating game has experienced discrimination. <br /><br />By Ventura's logic the state will always be necessary as long as people have different skin pigmentation. Perhaps Jesse Jackson, I mean Ventura, should be called a Serial Equalist.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-68229817523369087162014-03-24T19:24:53.501-04:002014-03-24T19:24:53.501-04:00JW's an idiot most of the time but now and the...JW's an idiot most of the time but now and then, like a broken clock, he gets something right. You gotta wade through a ton of BS to catch that moment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-82422602794566171012014-03-24T17:49:47.395-04:002014-03-24T17:49:47.395-04:00Basically. His modus operandi is to simply negate...Basically. His <i>modus operandi</i> is to simply negate any statement and use that as his argument. Then crawl away. Nice, clean, easy. A good day's work obviously.JFFnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-42928776221461803142014-03-24T17:38:03.058-04:002014-03-24T17:38:03.058-04:00What are you saying, Jerry? Are you saying marria...What are you saying, Jerry? Are you saying marriage did fine, not so fine, was in crisis and in need of State intervention before the government got involved? Derek Fnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-73531795658026435892014-03-24T17:05:07.353-04:002014-03-24T17:05:07.353-04:00Marriage did not do just fine before government st...Marriage did not do just fine before government stuck it's "camel's nose" under the tent. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com