tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post5567619876288962027..comments2024-02-13T02:39:22.756-05:00Comments on EconomicPolicyJournal.com: A Mom Is Being Charged After Appearing In Topless Snapchat Photos With Her Daughter Robert Wenzelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14296920597416905488noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-91925557818988407682013-12-19T20:29:48.564-05:002013-12-19T20:29:48.564-05:00Oh, yes, Alaska3636, I do like the idea of panarch...Oh, yes, Alaska3636, I do like the idea of panarchy. Very much.<br />I was just trying to understand how certain ideas worked in the world we have now and how to successfully explain to others how it all related to libertarian thought.<br /><br />- RothbardianamericanHelotAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-8109775629681587472013-12-19T20:23:33.172-05:002013-12-19T20:23:33.172-05:00"Human beings can't morally be owned.&quo..."Human beings can't morally be owned." So that means parents do not own their own bodies and that which they produce with them, i.e. their sperm and their eggs and that which results from the combination. How seemingly very anti-libertarian. You can own a building you create, but not a life? Why the inconsistency?<br />Why would parents be responsible for nurturing them and caring Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-74681203431641146502013-12-19T16:18:03.343-05:002013-12-19T16:18:03.343-05:00Libertarians are always trying to institute one-si...Libertarians are always trying to institute one-size-fits-all libertarian solutions. Kind of ironic. In a true decentralized, libertarian world, there would be many creative, NAP-abiding solutions to choose from and if you didn't like them you could move to an area whose solutions you more agreed with.Alaska3636noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-21958824017064611552013-12-19T04:36:58.693-05:002013-12-19T04:36:58.693-05:00Interesting Debate on this issue of 'child own...Interesting Debate on this issue of 'child ownership' between Walter Block and Stefan Molyneux:<br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgCmoVbdYtE&feature=youtu.beAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-74158042052351166832013-12-18T23:59:35.725-05:002013-12-18T23:59:35.725-05:00Human beings can't morally be owned. That woul...Human beings can't morally be owned. That would be slavery. Parents have a responsibility to nurture and care for their children or not have them in the first place.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3758330678390419129.post-89818444994318413762013-12-18T22:34:07.106-05:002013-12-18T22:34:07.106-05:00"misdemeanor child endangerment", becaus..."misdemeanor child endangerment", because, according to the state - The State - is the true owner, and it alone gets to decide what is, or is not, child endangerment. [Next up: taking a bath while not wearing a foam helmet is child endangerment? After that: riding a motorcycle under age 25 is child endangerment? Where does it stop?]<br /><br />Some people say the parents are the owners.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com