Judge Andrew Napolitano:
"Do We Still Have a Constitution?"
Monday, April 21, 6:00 - 7:00 p.m.
Furman Hall, 9th Floor, Lester Pollack Colloquium
Judge Andrew Napolitano, one of America's staunchest advocates for individual liberty, will discuss the present-day assault on the Constitution, from NSA spying, to Obamacare's mandates, to the President's rule by executive fiat. What does it mean to have a Constitution in a world where natural rights -- speech, press, worship, self-defense, travel, bodily integrity, privacy, etc. -- are constantly infringed by the President and Congress, and the courts abide by refusing to enforce constitutional guarantees?
This event is open to the public. Please feel free to forward this invitation to friends and colleagues. Refreshments will be provided.
Judge Napolitano is a senior judicial analyst at Fox News and distinguished visiting professor of law at Brooklyn Law School. He is the author of seven books on the U.S. Constitution, including two New York Times best sellers.
Hosted by the Federalist Society
(ht Felix Bronstein)
The Constitution was not created to protect natural rights. The purpose was to form an indissoluble nation out of 13 sovereign states. The Bill of Rights was introduced by the 1st Congress to get Rhode Island and North Carolina to ratify the Constitution. The Constitution was ratified without a Bill of Rights.
ReplyDeleteIndissoluble. L O fucking L. What theory of agency can you force someone to be a principal or an agent? Ohh right none. Would love to hear your criticism of Spooner's constitution of no authority. Seriously. Prove you've read it rather than lifting an amazon review.
DeleteCrickets.... JW = pussy
DeleteI think time permitting, Robert should do a monthly summary on "JERRY WOLFGANG'S GREATEST HITS!", but this is probably gonna be humourless as people will feel sad for him.
DeleteI almost shed a tear for poor Wolfie, he is a complete embarrassment, not only does he have no life given the amount of time he spends by commenting on every post to satiate his voyeuristic tendencies but also he fails to learn concepts as simple as the Broken Window Fallacy, Non-Agression Principle and ABCT that even a noob who isn't brainwashed in Statism would get instantly.