This is very strange analysis from Chomsky, aside from creating a strawman as to what Ron Paul said about a dying man, he goes on to say that libertarianism is about a call for corporate tyranny, but then goes on to state that business wouldn't allow it because they can't live without a strong nanny state.
Which is it Noam, liberty creates corporate tyranny or the nanny state does? And how is liberty savage, when it is government that is about the monopolization of force and its use on a massive scale, to coerce people in their daily lives and on a broader scale launch wars regularly that have resulted in hundreds of millions dead?
What terrible thinking.
(ht Travis Holte)