Am I the only one that has noticed? Does anyone else read WSJ OP-Eds?
For the last week or so, WSJ has put them behind its pay-wall, yet i haven't seen any comment about it.
It appears that overall WSJ now has increased the amount of its content behind the paywall to around 80% to 90% of all its content, from probably 50%.
I don't think I am quite up to paying for a neo-con screed telling me that taxes need to be raised so that we can attack the Italian speaking region of Switzerland.
I have noticed and I agree with your assessment - its not worth the price. The value is in the headlines as the content seems as biased as the NYT (although in a neo-con direction).
ReplyDeleteHowever, there is a big market for neo-con blatherings and it could be successful.