In my view in the long run better scans mean fewer pat-downs!
I would encourage people to start by calculating the "p" that, twenty years from now, the major airlines get nationalized. Work backwards from there and compute the liberty-maximizing policy.
This goes directly to the point I made in an earlier post:
What Cowen doesn't get is that the real objection to the TSA is that it is a government body interfering between two parties entering into a contract, the passenger and the airline.
Many economists really need to get a better grasp of the importance of private transactions as a key to freedom, rather than simply starting at the point where government intervention is a given. Do they not comprehend that there are non-coercive market solutions to these problems? Rather than becoming propaganda agents for the government, they should really start taking a deeper look about freedom solutions.
Further, I'm thinking that 20 years down the road, Tyler would be pro airline nationalization, this way:
In my view in the long run, nationalization under a strong airline czar means less government intervention!Then again, he may not argue this way.
I would encourage people to start by calculating the "p" that, twenty years from now, some megalomaniac from a corporatist billionaire family gains power in the country. Work backwards from there and compute the liberty-maximizing policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment