This defense of gentrification was correct but Charles is the guy that was recommending bear sterns in 2008 and telling people on tv that the worst was over.
He's worse than a broken clock because at least that clock is right twice a day. Charles is sometimes right 3 times a day sometimes 0. No idea about ABCT or seemingly the money supply role in our economy.
Charles makes a "special" appearance in the Peter schiff was right video.
The discussion was rational, respectful, and without the race baiting histrionics of other "news" shows which emphasizes entertainment over substance. Definitely worth another invite.
so white flight was bad and detrimental to communities, and now when white people move back in thats terrible too. is the only acceptable mix whatever it was when he was growing up in new york?
It never surprises me that university professors are stupid but when they are 50+ years old and have the mind of an idiot child it becomes disgusting. University is a place where the weak want to spend their entire life...You can escape the efforts and adult realities of being a productive person.
The professor has pick up on something that does not seem right, but his argument based on gentrification is incorrect. Perhaps these people really want to live in Manhattan, but cannot afford to. What would we call what is happening in Manhattan – gentrification squared? The real problem is the FED printing money at light speed. This situation would not likely exist if the money supply was stable. So, in this sense, the professor is correct to point out that something is not right, but he’s incorrect in couching in terms of gentrification.
If the Red Professor is weak (according to two of the posters here) how is it that the permanent government bureaucracy, the MSM and Hollywood mouth the Red Professor's line?
Charles P. has come a long way in the past couple of years, as far as coming around to "our" views. Witness the fact that he was guest hosting for Judge Napolitano all this week, while the Judge was on vacation. I watched, and it looks like Payne has been paying attention to what the Judge teaches.
I had Naison as a professor back in 2004 when I attended Fordham University. The course title was "The 1960s." I believe it counted toward my American Pluralism requirement. I knew nothing about politics, economics or liberty at the time but I still found his agenda repulsive at an instinctual level. I figured my gut reaction was correct since most of the other students liked him and his message. I found him to be an egomaniac which comes through in this video clip (me, me, me, I protected the neighborhood, I had the perfect ratio of diversity exposure, everyone should be forced to have the same experience my kids had). He inferred that anyone that didn't experience his perfectly racially diverse life is somehow inferior (and likely racist). Of course he forced the class to purchase his book "White Boy" as part of the course curriculum. He's a typical university professor that has little knowledge of how economic laws impact society and instead harps about income distribution and racial inequality that can only be solved by government.
This defense of gentrification was correct but Charles is the guy that was recommending bear sterns in 2008 and telling people on tv that the worst was over.
ReplyDeleteHe's worse than a broken clock because at least that clock is right twice a day. Charles is sometimes right 3 times a day sometimes 0. No idea about ABCT or seemingly the money supply role in our economy.
Charles makes a "special" appearance in the Peter schiff was right video.
The discussion was rational, respectful, and without the race baiting histrionics of other "news" shows which emphasizes entertainment over substance. Definitely worth another invite.
ReplyDeleteso white flight was bad and detrimental to communities, and now when white people move back in thats terrible too. is the only acceptable mix whatever it was when he was growing up in new york?
ReplyDeleteIt never surprises me that university professors are stupid but when they are 50+ years old and have the mind of an idiot child it becomes disgusting. University is a place where the weak want to spend their entire life...You can escape the efforts and adult realities of being a productive person.
ReplyDeleteProfessor of African Studies. African Studies! Outside of university what can one do with that degree except ferment class envy and warfare?
ReplyDeleteThe chances of getting invited to the White House for a beer are looking pretty good, don't you think?
Just another bratty and narcissistic University Humanities Department weakling. Charles should be embarrassed for him.
ReplyDeleteThe professor has pick up on something that does not seem right, but his argument based on gentrification is incorrect. Perhaps these people really want to live in Manhattan, but cannot afford to. What would we call what is happening in Manhattan – gentrification squared? The real problem is the FED printing money at light speed. This situation would not likely exist if the money supply was stable. So, in this sense, the professor is correct to point out that something is not right, but he’s incorrect in couching in terms of gentrification.
ReplyDeleteIf the Red Professor is weak (according to two of the posters here) how is it that the permanent government bureaucracy, the MSM and Hollywood mouth the Red Professor's line?
ReplyDeleteCharles P. has come a long way in the past couple of years, as far as coming around to "our" views. Witness the fact that he was guest hosting for Judge Napolitano all this week, while the Judge was on vacation. I watched, and it looks like Payne has been paying attention to what the Judge teaches.
ReplyDeleteJudge is back from vacation Tuesday!
I remember Charles apologising to Peter Schiff for laughing at him before the recession-depression so he seems a decent kind of guy.
ReplyDeleteI had Naison as a professor back in 2004 when I attended Fordham University. The course title was "The 1960s." I believe it counted toward my American Pluralism requirement. I knew nothing about politics, economics or liberty at the time but I still found his agenda repulsive at an instinctual level. I figured my gut reaction was correct since most of the other students liked him and his message. I found him to be an egomaniac which comes through in this video clip (me, me, me, I protected the neighborhood, I had the perfect ratio of diversity exposure, everyone should be forced to have the same experience my kids had). He inferred that anyone that didn't experience his perfectly racially diverse life is somehow inferior (and likely racist). Of course he forced the class to purchase his book "White Boy" as part of the course curriculum. He's a typical university professor that has little knowledge of how economic laws impact society and instead harps about income distribution and racial inequality that can only be solved by government.
ReplyDelete