The same Senate bill, 1813, known as MAP-21, that calls for the Secretary of State to revoke or deny a passport to any US citizen that the IRS Commissioner deems as having 'seriously delinquent tax debt', also calls for, in section 31406 of the bill. the mandatory installation of 'black box' event recorders to be installed in every new passenger vehicle starting with model year 2015:
SEC. 31406. VEHICLE EVENT DATA RECORDERS.
(a) Mandatory Event Data Recorders-
(1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall revise part 563 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, to require, beginning with model year 2015, that new passenger motor vehicles sold in the United States be equipped with an event data recorder that meets the requirements under that part...
(d) Revised Requirements for Event Data Recorders- Based on the findings of the study under subsection (c), the Secretary shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding to revise part 563 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. The rule--
(1) shall require event data recorders to capture and store data related to motor vehicle safety covering a reasonable time period before, during, and after a motor vehicle crash or airbag deployment, including a rollover;
(2) shall require that data stored on such event data recorders be accessible, regardless of vehicle manufacturer or model, with commercially available equipment in a specified data format;
(3) shall establish requirements for preventing unauthorized access to the data stored on an event data recorder in order to protect the security, integrity, and authenticity of the data; and
(4) may require an interoperable data access port to facilitate universal accessibility and analysis.
(e) Disclosure of Existence and Purpose of Event Data Recorder- The rule issued under subsection (d) shall require that any owner’s manual or similar documentation provided to the first purchaser of a passenger motor vehicle for purposes other than resale--
(1) disclose that the vehicle is equipped with such a data recorder...
(f) Access to Event Data Recorders in Agency Investigations- Section 30166(c)(3)(C) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘, including any electronic data contained within the vehicle’s diagnostic system or event data recorder’ after ‘equipment.’
New business idea: disable black box recorders. Install a switch for $300.
ReplyDelete(3) shall establish requirements for preventing unauthorized access to the data stored on an event data recorder in order to protect the security, integrity, and authenticity of the data; and
DeleteBlack market black box removal.
Once removal detected, instant trip to Camp FEMA
DeleteDon't forget section (f), which adds new language to 49 US Code 30166 to allow the Secretary of Transportation to come inspect the black box if the car is an accident. The added language is in <<>> below:
ReplyDelete49 USC 30166
(c) Matters That Can Be Inspected and Impoundment.— In carrying out this chapter, an officer or employee designated by the Secretary of Transportation—
...
(3) at reasonable times, in a reasonable way, and on display of proper credentials and written notice to an owner, operator, or agent in charge, may—
...
(B) enter and inspect with reasonable promptness premises at which a vehicle or equipment involved in a motor vehicle accident is located;
(C) inspect with reasonable promptness that vehicle or equipment <<, including any electronic data contained within the vehicle’s diagnostic system or event data recorder>>; and
(D) impound for not more than 72 hours a vehicle or equipment involved in a motor vehicle accident.
One might wonder why the federal government needs to be involved in car accidents, but since the statute says they have to be "reasonable" there is no cause for concern.
49 CFR 563 has a table that shows all the types of information these things have to record.
Simple. Another way to take our cars.
DeleteJust combine this with other laws.
Cop sees a nice car. Taps it with his cruiser. Now there's a traffic "accident". The car is impounded. Drugs are "found". Government now owns car. Simple.
Credentials No warrent no entry. This is the first step controling where you go and what you do. Sounds like violation of 4th ammendment like the recently shot down cop GPS activity and 5th ammendment where you can no be compelled to provide testimony against yourself.One would argue tha it is no ditterent than forced fingerprinting, DNA or a hair sample. This different, older cars wont have this so the 14th comes in under equal protection.
DeleteAnonymous 10:21: "One might wonder why the federal government needs to be involved in car accidents, but since the statute says they have to be "reasonable" there is no cause for concern."
ReplyDeleteGovernment bureaucrats see trespassing, snooping, prying, stealing, etc., as "reasonable" ALL THE TIME!
But this new legislation doesn't sound very much different from the totalitarian "Onstar" surveillance placed into Government Motors vehicles.
Watch for increase in sales of used cars in the next few years.
Someone should enforce a law that puts black boxes IN statesmen.
ReplyDeleteThis has nothing to do with accidents.
ReplyDeleteThis has to do with enabling the DEA or other DHS agencies to interrogate the black box on demand to determine where the vehicle has been for a period of time before the interrogation.
This sidesteps the SC decision that police cannot install a tracking device without probably cause. This bill intends that an official pursuant to an investigation (accident or other) can interrogate the blackbox to determine a number of things about a vehicle prior to the interrogation. Practically speaking this means that anyone with the proper technical means (any LEO certainly, possibly others) can interrogate your vehicle covertly. If they find anything they have the option to then 'discover' (manufacture - common practice in impound-happy jurisdictions) probable cause, at which point your property (certainly) and your life/career/reputation (probably) are all toast - all with no hearing or conviction of anything under current laws.
Nice. Huh.
Current required EDR data elements are:
Delete-Delta-V, longitudinal
-Maximum delta-V,longitudinal
-Time, maximum delta-V
-Speed, vehicle indicated
-Engine throttle, % full (or accelerator pedal, % full)
-Service brake, on/off
-Ignition cycle, crash
-Ignition cycle,download
-Safety belt status, driver
-Frontal air bag warning lamp, on/off
-Frontal air bag deployment, time to deploy, in the case of a single stage air bag, or time to first stage deployment, in the case of a multi-stage air bag, driver
-Frontal air bag deployment, time to deploy, in the case of a single stage air bag, or time to first stage deployment, in the case of a multi-stage air bag, right front passenger
-Multi-event, number of events (1,2)
-Time from event 1 to 2
-Complete file recorded(yes, no)
It should be noted, however, that while SB 1813 requires that the DOT change 49 CFR 563 to make EDR's mandatory, the 49 CRF 563 itself is administrative law ... which is to say that DOT can change it without Congress.
FWIW, the specification does NOT RECORD DATA ONLY FOR A FEW MILLISECONDS BEFORE CRASH. Some of the data elements are to be recorded for the life of the vehicle.
I would be interested to see what data elements SB1813 adds to the mandatory 15 I listed. So, geocoordinate fields are not MANDATORY today. But they may be added at some later time. And of course, the manufacturer may add the information to the EDR as a business spinoff (like ONSTAR) at any time.
Here is the kicker in the DOT FAQ that is recorded for a host of questions about what the EDR records:
"Can EDRs record my conversations or a video?
NHTSA does not require EDRs to contain any personal identification information."
Today, they don't REQUIRE the EDR to collect your personal information.
Need ref number for :calls for the Secretary of State to revoke or deny a passport to any US citizen that the IRS Commissioner deems as having 'seriously delinquent tax debt', also calls for,
ReplyDeletea number of people posting about this passport ssue but no ref to it on the bill...?
It doesn't look like these record location, and what they do record they record for only a few seconds before an incident.
ReplyDeleteI would be more concerned about GM installing Onstar as factory equipment on many of its cars.
Onstar, maybe, but Federally mandated Onstar sounds a little fishy to me.
ReplyDeleteWell, it is GM (Government Motors). Making Onstar factory equipment means it can be turned on at any time, basically acting as a tracking device for those who don't like cell phones.
DeleteMaybe I'm just paranoid.
The EDR's on current new cars CANNOT be disconnected BUT they can be made to read/put out GIBBERISH!
ReplyDeleteLet them mandate these EDR's and let them think they control the content but they do NOT!
ALGORYTHIM's will be made public to make them null & void!
ALGORYTHIM's will be made public to make them null & void!
ReplyDeleteAs with all data collecting laws if enough people implement the inevitable counter measures the department responsible can be snowed under by sheer amounts of data. It just means the people have to "grow a pair" as the saying goes. Anyway we are talking about some time in the future and if things go the way as predicted governments are going to have thier hands full with the revolution. Fingers crossed.
Wonder how many Federal Employees they will do this to?? Or are those Fed Employees exempt?? Seems like there are hundreds of Federal Employees that are quite in arrears with their taxes.
ReplyDeleteNot too long ago, Senator Kent Conrad was considering a device to measure miles driven in order to assess a "mileage" tax. Could this section of the bill be a wolf in sheeps clothing with a tax surprise attached to it? Beware of fine print in Senate bills.
ReplyDeleteif you drive a car – I’ll tax the street;
if you try to sit – I’ll tax your seat;
if you get too cold – I’ll tax the heat;
if you take a walk – I’ll tax your feet.
- Lyrics from the Beatles song Taxman
WHY is this necessary and will congress and the president be exempt? They're not going to be in office forever. WHO gains from this?
ReplyDeleteSeems like congress is trying to hang itself thinking "it won't apply to ME!"
Contact your congressman NOW to let them know how you feel on this issue.
ReplyDelete