Tuesday, May 1, 2012

The Advance of a One World Government and a North American Union

The evil inside the White House operative, Cass Sunstein, is out this morning with a short essay in WSJ.

Under the guise of filling us all in on what his White House department is doing to "clear away red tape", the evil bastard is really informing his followers about the advancements in one world government and a North American union:
In an interdependent global economy, diverse regulations can cause trouble for companies doing business across national boundaries. Unnecessary differences in countries' regulatory requirements can cost money, compromising economic growth and job creation. Think of divergent requirements for car headlights, or the labeling of food, or standards for container sizes.

Recognizing this, President Obama's Jobs Council has called for U.S. agencies to better align U.S. regulations with those of our major trading partners. And today the president is issuing an executive order, "Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation," with a simple goal: to promote exports, growth, and job creation by eliminating unnecessary regulatory differences across nations.

The order makes clear that we will not undermine American laws or compromise our national prerogatives. But it emphasizes that international cooperation and harmonization can increase trade and job creation, eliminating pointless burdens without creating a regulatory race to the bottom. From now on, an interagency working group chaired by the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs [Note; Sunstein chairs this agency-RW]  will be a forum for reducing this red tape.
Here's the advancing of the North American union:
More generally, President Obama has worked closely with his Canadian and Mexican counterparts to create High-Level Regulatory Cooperation Councils with both countries. The councils are developing and implementing plans to eliminate or prevent the creation of unnecessary burdens on cross-border trade, streamline regulatory requirements, and promote greater certainty for the general public and for businesses in the regulation of food, pharmaceuticals, nanotechnology and other areas.

The U.S. and Canada have already agreed to harmonize their rules with respect to fuel economy, building on a long history of collaboration on national emission standards for new vehicles. This step will avoid divergent requirements and unnecessary costs on both automobile companies and consumers.
Here's the advance of the One World government:
The U.S. is also working closely with the European Union to eliminate unnecessary differences in U.S.-European regulatory requirements. Last February, the Obama administration announced an agreement with the EU under which organic products certified as such in Europe or in the U.S. may be sold as "organic" in either jurisdiction. This is not just a victory for those who grow and eat organic broccoli. The trans-Atlantic partnership, involving the two largest organic food producers in the world, will help support jobs in the years to come.

Whether the issue involves chemicals or vegetables, nations can do a far better job of harmonizing regulatory requirements to make it easier for companies to do business, and without sacrificing public health, safety and the environment. We hope that today's executive order provides a new model for eliminating red tape and promoting trade and job creation. Let's get to work.
Bottom line: You have been warned by the evil insider, himself, the march towards a North American union and a one world government continues.


  1. Ask your friends in the medical device industry about the new IEC-601 3rd edition standard.

    It's now required that all medical devices conform.
    It's a euro standard, but we're all "harmonizing" now.
    Anyhow, this thing looks like a phone book, and it's in EU bureaucrat - eze so it's incomprehensible.
    Oh wait, they've helpfully written half of it in FRENCH!! Oh, that's better.

    So it's brought our (small) company to a standstill.
    And did I mention the proposed medical device tax surcharge?
    See you at the unemployment office.

  2. Because, you know, world standards like Basel helps all of us. We certainly don't want every business person experimenting with diverse models.

    And we all know that large bureaucracies doling out world wide rules and regulations are a systemic and structural aid to innovation and creativity.

  3. But might this address some of the undesirable side effects of protectionism, albeit from an evil, one world conspiratorial direction?

  4. President Paul will REPEAL all such "harmonizing" through executive order.

  5. Population control really seems like a bad dream or a movie. Yet I'm constantly reinforced in my beliefs that they just want to slowly kill millions while draining their wealth and energy. Since killing, say, one billion people at once is idiotic and counterproductive to their goals, use the people until they die of "natural causes."

    "Arrows cost money. Use the Irish, the dead cost nothing." --Edward Longshanks in Braveheart

  6. The metric world will not be far behind

  7. The power structure of the State remains at the federal level. It's important not to get distracted by moves toward global government.

  8. Why do you characterize them as "evil?"

    First, I don't see what is so bad about trying to make it easier for people to do business. That really is what these changes are about. Certainly that, in itself, is not evil? Or to ask it a different way, what is so virtuous about protectionism? When we fail to make regulations more compatible for international trade, we are really just imposing a kind of tariff or barrier on trade. Economically, that is inefficient.

    Second, where in this do you see a secret plot to unify North America and Europe? They were pretty explicit that they were only out to eliminate pointless or duplicate regulations, not to actually change the US regulatory regime in any substantive way.

    I have to say, I am a democratic insider, and can tell you that there is no globalist plot afoot. We want the US to retain total sovereignty, and don't trust foreign governments any more than you do. I think that posts like this are a symptom of a kind of political inbreeding these days that arises from a lack of intellectual discourse across the isle.

  9. Yeah man, you spelled it right out - keep up the good posts!
    More on the NAU:

  10. Impale the New World Order. Make their flesh cheaper than dust.

  11. O.W.G being re-branded as "Global Democracy" under a U.N mandate, in a speech to the Commonwealth Club on July 12th 2012.