Wednesday, July 18, 2012

The Big Mistake by the Obama Birth Certificate Forger

By Paul Huebl



Sheriff Joe Arpaio deserves criticism for the treatment of prisoners not convicted of crimes being held in his jail. Those are arrested people that deserve the presumption of innocence that Joe’s punitive jail mocks.

Joe failed in his selection of a disloyal Chief Deputy that had been a really poor choice. On the other hand a loyal and fine man was castigated and banished from his administration in error. Joe is a lot of things and perfect is not one of them. I have known Joe from before he was elected.

I do agree with him on many issues.

I have to respect the science of document examination and the evidence there points to the forgery pictured above. There are also serious signs that the forger of the Obama birth certificate released by the Whitehouse did not understand codes and numbers associated with the document. Analysis of the numbers and code revealed that the document is not genuine. The evidence is more than compelling.

The biggest error came as a result of the age of the document forger. He or she was obvoulsy too young to be aware of correct terms used to classify what we today call African-Americans. The creator of the phony document listed Obama’s race as African. That is a huge red flag because that term was not applied as a race title until well into the 1980’s. That term and the moniker, Black would have been considered politically incorrect and racist back when Obama was born. The proper term throughout history until the late 1970’s was Negro. The government did not change this until well into the 1980s.

Additionally the United States government standardized the acceptable terms for all identification documents. Eventually Negro became an apparent derogatory term that sensitive politically correct Americans abandoned in the 1980’s.

Read the rest here.

36 comments:

  1. The person who released it might have been just so PC they thought it was even worth altering it to remove the word "Negro."

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. As much as I'd like a big juicy scandal here, I DON'T find the evidence compelling.
    The term "African" is assigned to his FATHER. Well, Hell, his father WAS African. No PC there. I think it is perfectly understandable for some clerk in Hawaii to describe him (the FATHER) as "African".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. the evidence shows that the number 9 left in the box was code for "left blank" the fact that anything was placed in the box after being coded with the 9 means that the document was tampered with...

      i stand with sheriff joe... come clean obama.

      Delete
    2. That is not true:

      The meaning of the Numeric Code "9" was "other nonwhite."

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/07/indicting-the-sheriff-joe-and-the-cold-case-posse/

      Delete
  4. "The creator of the phony document listed Obama’s race as African"

    He listed Obama's FATHER's race as African.

    Was African not used to describe somebody from Africa back then?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep. Right there is the red flag for me in regards to this guy's "analysis", unless I'm just not seeing where they designated Obama's race. Obama is a complete and utter piece of shit, no matter where he was born. This is a waste of time.

      Delete
    2. The answer to your question is yes.

      The officials in Hawaii have said several times that they have no list of what the names of races are. People were not required to use specific words; they could just say whatever word they wanted to describe their race. Some even listed their races as "American," which is certainly not a race, but the fact is that they said it, and that is what appears on their child's BC.

      So Obama's father was allowed to say "African." And what was the word that African exchange students used to describe their race in the 1960s? AFRICAN. And what was the word that the British officials in Kenya (which was still a colony, called the Kenya Colony in 1961) used to describe the black residents of the colony? AFRICANS.

      Delete
  5. If the father's race is listed as "African", then why isn't the mother's race listed as "American" (instead of "Caucasian")?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She had the right to use American, but she chose to describe herself as Caucasian. There was no list of the words that people could use. Some actually did use American. And, since they could use any word that they wanted, what was the word that African exchange students used to describe their race in the 1960s. Answer: African.

      Delete
  6. I believe someone wanted to put in "African" rather than "Keneyan" or "Somali" for the race/nationality of his father. If his father was African-American, they would know he was American and then dig deeper and put in Negro or Black. Barack Obama is not African.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You are all missing the point that Arpaio's investigators made that the hand written numbers are codes that represent something. In this case a 9 meant that no information was provided. Why would it be coded as no information provided when there is now information? When was this information filled in?

    Also, if you look at the videos that explain all the evidence, there are many more red flags. This is just one small point among a mountain of red flags.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems that the Sheriff messed up badly when he talked about the numeric codes.

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/07/code-9-the-cold-case-posses-big-lie/

      Delete
  8. The African quip is the most minor of issues with this document. Even that is a non issue the fact that is undeniable is that this document was created on a computer. It is not a scan of an original and the president of the united states has been lying about it. He should be forced to answer for his lies before congress sends him another piece of legislation to sign.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was a scanned image of the long-form BC that Hawaii has stated that it sent to Obama, and the officials in Hawaii have repeatedly stated in writing that the fact on the birth certificate that Obama has shown are IDENTICAL, that they MATCH, the facts on the document in the files.

      The following experts say that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, and the State of Hawaii, which is the real expert on whether or not its birth certificate is forged, certainly hasn’t.

      Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said: “The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

      Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it. … I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

      John Woodman, independent computer professional, said in a series of videos that the claims of fakery that he examined were unfounded.

      Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: “All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.”

      Delete
    2. Goulding said it was OCR software but failed to check in the properties of the document which would have shown the words identified if it had been run through OCR software. Furthermore text would have been searchable and editable, it was not. He also suggested the optimizing could be the culprit. Unfortunately the layer construction when looking at 8-bit vs. 1-bit construction.

      John Wood self-published a book on the subject and told us he's a software expert. All those videos you referenced from Woodman featured him using Paint Shop Pro to look at the document. He showed no familiarity with Paint Shop Pro or Adobe prodcuts perhaps other than Acrobat. Paint Shop Pro is not a tool used by true experts. Arpaio's experts cracked up laughing when they heard that Woodman was trying to draw meaningful conclusons by using Paint Shop Pro a software no real expert would use.

      Ivan Zatkovich looked at the document when of the anomalies, such as the clipping mask hiding information, were not known. He also said it's hard to tell what was changed and what was not changed. That leaves the door open for forgery. Rather than watch the poster above cherry pick the Zatkovich report, I'll just post it so all interested can read his work and draw their own conclusions.

      http://www.teapartypowerhour.com//files/Zatkovich-Obama-PDF-report-final.pdf

      All I can say for Krawetz, is if he didn't see any side of alterations, he wasn't looking very hard or for very long. Let's start with why the document contained a clipping mask that hides information not seen on the document in a photo taken by an NBC reporter just before it scanned into a computer and posted as a PDF. Would Krawetz can answer that, then I will believe there has been no manipulation. Many experts with credentials equal or better than his disagree.

      Delete
  9. This is the link I emailed Donald Trump over a year ago. Being quite familiar with Adobe's products, I cannot argue with the author of this video (as ya'll can check it out yourselves). I must conclude that the birth certificate is in fact fake.

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obama's BC was not created in Adobe Illustrator. It is a scanned image in PDF software of the birth certificate that Hawaii officials have stated that they sent to Obama and they have said in writing several times that the facts on the image of the birth certificate that the White House has published are identical, that they match, the facts on the document in their files.

      For more information on the forgery claims see:

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/06/wheres-the-expert-certificate/

      And:

      http://www.amazon.com/Barack-Obamas-Birth-Certificate-Fraud/dp/0983759251/ref=as_li_tf_ssw?&linkCode=wss&tag=obamaconspthe-20

      And:

      http://gratewire.com/topic/tea-party-conservative-refutes-claims-of-obama-birth-certificate-forgery

      Delete
    2. Funny they don't just say it's the same document. That's because it's contained in several documents in their files, some added as late as late 2006 and early 2007. I'm still waiting for a HDOH official to say that's exactly what we gave them and it's all contained in one document in our files. You'll never hear that because they can't say that and not go to jail.

      Delete
  10. Obama's father's race is given as "African" because, according to Kurt Tsue at the Hawaii Dept of Health, that info is supplied by the parents and "we accept what the parents self identify themselves to be." It doesn't seem unreasonable that Obama's father would have identified himself as African.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes but according to the 1960 manual anyone who self-identified as C, Colored, A.A., Afro-American or black was to be recorded as Negro. That's straight from the Gov Vital Statistics instruction manual.. Kurt Tsue needs to go back and read the manual the HDOH would have been legally obligated to follow.

      Delete
  11. Any nation that would accept a Hawaiian birth certificate signed by "U.K.L. Lee" deserves everything it has coming to them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now THIS was the funny part to me. At least it wasn't signed Ty Ne Bubbles.

      Delete
    2. It wasn't signed by "U. K. L. Lee." It was signed by Verna K. Lee, who is she? She is the 95-year old misquoted by Sheriff Joe.

      Delete
    3. Misquoted. SO you talked to her and she said that. I listened to the tape. She wasn't misquoted stop lying OBOT.

      Delete
  12. Keep your eye on the ball here folks - don't get lost in the minutiae. This document is so clearly fraudulent, it would not stand up in court for for a minute. If his true status a an American citizen can not be established, then under the constitution, he is ineligible to be president. If that is in fact the case, then everything he has signed is fraudulent, and must be rescinded. We have a constitutional crisis and have in fact been leaderless for over three years. That is why no court in the land will address this, including the Supreme Court. It is the third rail that no one will touch.

    It is undeniable that he has spent a great amount of time, effort, and (taxpayer) money to hide, obfuscate, and seal any records of his past - the most closed president in history. The question is why? Something is very, very, very wrong. This is no joke. Your future and the future of your children hangs in the balance. Pay attention...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The officials in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent Obama's Hawaii birth certificate to Obama and that the facts on the BC that he has posted are EXACTLY the same as the ones on the BC in the files. The existence of a Hawaii BC in 1961 is further confirmed by the Index Data (a public file showing the BCs that are on file that shows one for Obama in 1961) and by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 that were sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii and which at the time only sent out those notices for children who had been born in Hawaii.

      The stuff about spending a great deal of money on hiding things is another birther lie.

      Delete
    2. Isn't interesting that the roaches have crawled out of the walls to defend a document signed by U K L Lee.

      Truly if it wasn’t so sad it would be funny. "A birther lie"??? When you have no logical defense, all you can do is call people names. The truth is being revealed, and it scares the living crap out of you. Every day more and more people are awakened to the fraud that has been committed. There is nothing you can say or do to stop it.

      THIS WILL NOT GO AWAY!

      Delete
    3. Exactly!

      Even the forgers are having a good laugh at the Obama administration for posting this joke. As for the officials in Hawaii, we all completely trust them - yea right! They would never falsify a public file, or manufacture a press release (Oh heaven forbid).

      You are too naive to even be involved this discussion.

      Delete
    4. U K L Lee's name was Verna K. Lee (The "L" has been imagined; it simply isn't there), and so not U. K. L Lee. So, it wasn't a joke. There really was a Verna Lee. In fact, she was quoted (probably misquoted) by the Sheriff in his press conference.

      Re calling names. You are claiming that Obama's birth certificate is forged. That is calling names. In response, I show that the Sheriff and the Cold Case Posse were probably lying (and certainly mistaken) when they described the meaning of the numeric codes, which is key to their "evidence" that the birth certificate was forged.

      Oh, and the stuff about the "millions spent"--is also a lie.

      If you disagree, then show evidence of how much was spent. (BTW, the total expenditure of the law firm during the campaign involves a LOT more than trying law cases).

      Delete
    5. The "L" is not imagined. It is there. You have either never bothered to look at the document presented by the White House, or you are working for them.

      Lazy fool, or a shill...take your pick at which you want to be.

      Delete
  13. Uh huh. I suppose that the Federal Vital Statistics regulations of 1959 are in error and that "magical typestyles" suddenly appeared in 1961 that don't match the original? Or that Hawaii was 30 years ahead of the Federal government in mandating the word "African" instead of "Negro". It seems the Obama campaign is going overboard to try and subvert the findings of a LAW ENFORCEMENT investigation with pure lies.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Two separate issues.

    The codes used come from:

    "Tape File Information 1960-1961 natality Tape Files for the United States"

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/100438616/Vital-Statistics-Tape-File-Information-1960-1961-Natality-Tape-Files-for-the-United-States

    You can see the coding used.

    Sheriff Joe said that when the code "9" was used to describe race it indicted that the entry ndicates that the applicant for the birth certificate did not provide any information to put there. But that is not what the code means. It means "Other, nonwhite."--as you can see in the "Tape File Information 1960-1961."

    And in addition to that mistake, the Posse Video stated that they got its information from the 1961 manual, when it was from the 1968 manual. There is a difference.

    The second issue is African. No Hawaii was not ahead of its time. It was frugal. It figured that there were a lot of races in Hawaii, and it did not want to spend the time and money preparing a list of all of them, and making sure that everyone who filled in a form that asked for race followed the list. It let people fill in whatever the wanted. In this Hawaii is not alone. Arizona, for example, has a similar policy.

    Re: LAW ENFORCEMENT. There are a lot of sheriffs in this country, and they all have the right to claim that they made an investigation. Sheriff Joe chose to use as his main experts and investigators people from WND, which has been violently anti-Democrat for decades, having been responsible for the "Swiftboating" of Kerry and for the book "Obama Nation." WND and its staff and "experts" have the right to their views--but they can hardly be considered impartial experts.

    In any case, the Sheriff might be believed, if only he could get his facts straight.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It seems that Sheriff Joe and the Cold Case Posse falsified the information that they base their claims on:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/07/indicting-the-sheriff-joe-and-the-cold-case-posse/

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anyone else wonder why when the Media covers such events,they don't include any of the evidence in their "report."They instead attempt to smear the character and reputations.
    let's wake up, shall we? Link

    ReplyDelete
  17. All of this is Obama's fault for claiming he was born in Kenya whenever it was politically convenient for him to do so before he was on the national scene. birthcertificate.co.uk

    ReplyDelete