Monday, March 18, 2013

The Bizarre Government Regulations that May Send Gasoline Prices Through the Roof

This is really over the top regulation in action. You are going to get a headache trying to understand what is going on here, but someone, rest assured, is making a lot of money. Here's NYT trying to explain:
A glut of ethanol in the gasoline supply is threatening to push up prices at the pump and may have exacerbated the growing cost gap between regular gasoline and premium, some oil experts say.

Refiners have been trading so-called ethanol credits furiously in an effort to meet federal environmental mandates, helping to significantly push up the cost of those credits - a jump to more than $1 from a few pennies in the last several days, and drivers are feeling the effects, experts say.

Prices for premium gas are now about 30.2 cents over the price of regular, according to Trilby Lundberg of the Lundberg Survey. That is up from 24.1 cents in 2010 and 18.2 cents in 2000. Any increases could affect about a third of this year's car models, because premium fuel is required or recommended for them, according to

Experts disagree on the reasons for a widening gap between the costs of regular and premium gas. Reasons for the ethanol surplus are even more broadly in dispute, between producers and the oil companies. Gas companies are required under federal law to blend a certain number of gallons of ethanol into the fuel. But refiners argue that some cannot reach that requirement because they are nearing or at the so-called blend wall, the maximum percentage of ethanol in gasoline that most gas stations can handle, 10 percent. They also note that is the maximum level recommended by auto manufacturers for most cars.

Refiners blame Congress, arguing that the ethanol quota was set at a time when gasoline demand was expected to rise steadily. Instead, demand has declined, and refiners, obligated to blend more ethanol than they can actually use, have resorted to buying a lot of ethanol credits, known as renewable identification numbers (or RINs), to meet the mandated levels.

Ms. Lundberg described this as "buying forgiveness from the government." The credits' popularity has driven up the price nearly tenfold since January.

On the other side of the debate are the ethanol producers, who say prices are pushed lower because their product is cheaper than gasoline. This is true on a gallon-per-gallon basis, although ethanol provides less energy per gallon.

The argument over ethanol and gas prices highlights the politics of the Renewable Fuel Standard, set by a 2007 law. The ethanol lobby accuses the oil companies of ratcheting up the demand for fuel credits as a way of applying pressure on lawmakers to reduce the alternative fuel mandates. Congress could change the rules, or the Environmental Protection Agency, which set up the electronic marketplace where ethanol credits are traded, could adjust them.

The ethanol credits, like some other kinds of environmental credits, can be banked as well as bought and sold. Some companies have a surplus. But those without them have rushed into a market that is thinly traded, driving the spike in prices, according to the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, a trade association.

"The market's broken, because the Renewable Fuel Standard has been broken since the day it was enacted," said Charles T. Drevna, president of the group. The refiners rely on a certain amount of ethanol as a way to increase octane, but they have been fighting the standard since it was created, partly because it requires them to use advanced biofuels that are not actually in commercial production.

Oil refiners also warn that higher prices for the credits will encourage fraud, something the ethanol trading system has encountered in the past.

There are two ways the ethanol credit issue could drive gas prices higher. Mr. Drevna said that refiners would probably seek to recover the cost of the credits, which were a mere seven cents or so at the beginning of this year, in the prices they charge. And Eric G. Lee, an analyst at Citi Research, said that some refiners might seek to avoid the ethanol requirement by exporting their gas, which could tighten supplies in the United States.

According to Mr. Lee, large refiners spent $100 million to $300 million each for credits in 2012, when prices were about 4 cents. "At $1 a gallon levels, the numbers become astronomical very quickly," he said Wednesday.

Read the rest here.

Bottom line: What is going on here is that there is more ethanol available then refiners can use, thus the ethanol glut. At the same time, refiners are required to use this ethanol, but they can't because of the blending wall, so they have to buy ethanol credits from refiners who don't need them. Welcome to Regulation America.


  1. And Ethanol damages engines at any level, pollutes more than oil and is less efficient per gallon thus lowering your mpg.

    Meanwhile 60% of all corn in the US is now used to produce this net-loss fuel (that is it requires more oil to create it, then it generates in savings of oil at the pump) and the subsidies have ensured that farmers are growing corn constantly instead of rotating like they used to, which combined with the drought in the mid-west is causing deserts to form.

    But that isn't stopping the farmers from getting rich like mad -- for now.

    All because of a mandate to buy farmer's votes.

    This is the very definition of cronyism.

  2. I design instrumentation for refineries in Southeast Texas. One of these plants has a $10,000 a day fine for not using Cellulosic ethanol in their gas blend.

    Problem is, the process to mass produce that additive hasn't been invented.

    Why is gas so expensive? Gee, I wonder.

  3. I guess till the voting public wises up to the realities of over regulation and how over done bills written and paid for by lobbyists we will linger on through the land of Oz.