Sunday, February 9, 2014

Will The Overselling Of Global Warming Lead To A New Scientific Dark Age?

By Patrick Michaels
Will the overselling of climate change lead to a new scientific dark age? That’s the question being posed in the latest issue of an Australian literary journal,Quadrant, by Garth Paltridge, one of the world’s most respected atmospheric scientists.
Paltridge was a Chief Research Scientist with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO).  The latter is Australia’s equivalent of the National Science Foundation, our massive Federal Laboratory network, and all the governmental agency science branches rolled into one.
Paltridge lays out the well-known uncertainties in climate forecasting. These include our inability to properly simulate clouds that are anything like what we see in the real world, the embarrassing lack of average surface warming now in its 17th year, and the fumbling (and contradictory) attempts to explain it away[...]
Climate scientists have been profoundly defensive about the known problems. Paltridge elegantly explains that this has to be the case, and describes the likely horrific consequences when the day of reckoning finally arrives.
That day is coming closer, because, as Paltridge notes, people are catching on:
“…the average man in the street, a sensible chap who by now can smell the signs of an oversold environmental campaign from miles away, is beginning to suspect that it is politics rather than science which is driving the issue.”
The scientific establishment has painted itself into a corner over global warming. Paltridge’s explanations for this are depressingly familiar to those who read these columns.
Science changed dramatically in the 1970s, when the reward structure in the profession began to revolve around the acquisition of massive amounts of taxpayer funding that was external to the normal budgets of the universities and federal laboratories. In climate science, this meant portraying the issue in dire terms, often in alliance with environmental advocacy organizations. Predictably, scientists (and their institutions) became addicted to the wealth, fame, and travel in the front of the airplane:


  1. Yeah, well......these lying little bastards brought it on themselves. Seems like everything is politicized anymore.

  2. Ah, yes. Good times! Reminds me of the time I was crucified on a famous "Skeptical" website for having the poor taste or judgment to suggest that they should be more, well, skeptical.
    I couldn't remain silent as they declared that climate alarmism was just as solid as evolutionary science.
    You see, I was really bothered by the idea that they might get people thinking that maybe it was.

  3. Hahaha, this is too appropriate! Each time I click the link, the ad from Forbes is for NYSERDA (, one of the all-time best huckles perpetrated by politico-academic parasites upon the beleaguered denizens of that benighted state.

  4. With regards to the dynamics in addition to level of Atmospheric Jobs Zjob4u, this expenses change from supervisor for you to supervisor.