I recently began reading Isaac Asimov's Foundation trilogy. Early on you are introduced to a discipline Asimov labeled psychohistory, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychohistory_(fictional).
I immediately thought that it sounded like really bad economics. Lo and behold, here is a quote from a post by Paul Krugman, "Several commenters mentioned Issac Asimov’s Foundation novels. It’s somewhat embarrassing, but that’s how I got into economics: I wanted to be a psychohistorian when I grew up, and economics was as close as I could get." Here is the post from which the quote came from:
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/04/economic-science-fiction/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0.
Perhaps Krugman's work should be labeled science fiction?
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Psychohistory and Paul Krugman
Jamie Hoffman emails:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hmm, I don't think so. Normally even science fiction has some tenuous connection with the real world. Krugman? Not so much.
ReplyDeleteI think this is more appropriate.
ReplyDeletehttp://asset-3.soup.io/asset/3851/9444_3bd9.jpeg