Wednesday, April 23, 2014

The BLM Land Grab Endgame: Agenda 21

Michael Snyder writes:
Why is the federal government so obsessed with grabbing more land?  After all, the federal government already owns more than 40 percent of the land in 9 different U.S. states.  Why are federal bureaucrats so determined to grab even more?  Well, the truth is that this all becomes much clearer once you understand that there is a very twisted philosophy behind what they are doing.  It is commonly known as “Agenda 21″, although many names and labels are used for this particular philosophy.  Basically, those that hold to this form of radical environmentalism believe that humanity is utterly destroying the planet, and therefore the goal should be to create a world where literally everything that we do is tightly monitored and controlled by control freak bureaucrats in the name of “sustainable development”.  In their vision of the future, the human population will be greatly reduced and human activity will be limited to strictly regulated urban areas and travel corridors.  The rest of the planet will be left to nature.  To achieve this goal, a massive transfer of land from private landowners to the federal government will be necessary.
So the conflict between Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and the BLM is really just the tip of the iceberg.  The reality is that the BLM has their eyes on much bigger prizes.
For example, Breitbart is reporting that the BLM is looking at grabbing 90,000 privately-held acres along the Texas/Oklahoma border…
After the recent Bundy Ranch episode by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Texans are becoming more concerned about the BLM’s focus on 90,000 acres along a 116 mile stretch of the Texas/Oklahoma boundary. The BLM is reviewing the possible federal takeover and ownership of privately-held lands which have been deeded property for generations of Texas landowners.
Sid Miller, former Texas State Representative and Republican candidate for Texas Agriculture Commissioner, has since made the matter a campaign issue to Breitbart Texas.
“In Texas,” Miller says, “the BLM is attempting a repeat of an action taken over 30 years ago along the Red River when Tommy Henderson lost a federal lawsuit. The Bureau of Land Management took 140 acres of his property and didn’t pay him one cent.”

10 comments:

  1. Were Lincoln and the Union generals that took over the west secretly plotting to implement Agenda 21? Not that I'm anything but suspicious of a UN scheme, but all the attention allowed for Agenda 21 sure seems like convenient bait for controlled opposition.

    Glenn Beck, who wrote a book actually named "Agenda 21," even has a poster of Lincoln in his studio! This sort of thing keeps the organized, skeptical types, like the Tea Party, focusing their attention on witch hunts instead of learning the truth and being a real threat to the establishment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agenda 21 IS a real threat. Google Rosa Koire and read some of her work on the subject. Glenn Beck is a worthless shill.

      Delete
    2. Of course it is a real threat...but one that a runoff candidate for King of Agriculture, as establishment as it gets, is allowed to use as an approved campaign issue.

      Agenda 21 turns rational anti-political discussions into politics. Here's an example:

      There are lots of Tea Party and Glenn Beck sympathizers around here, who are so fixated on Agenda 21, that it comes up in nearly every grassroots meeting I've been to.

      As soon as someone mentions it, other people become emotional, start shouting, and generally lose control. Whatever the point of the event was is immediately out the window.

      The reaction is eerily similar to hot button "political issues" that politicians and the state media push, like race baiting, inequality, abortion, gay marriage, drugs, etc.

      It seems to give people the false belief that they have uncovered the "missing link" of all evil - a conveniently unified, coordinated, master plan of all globalist "powers that be."

      Unlike the Fed, imperialism, or police state, all of that rage can be directed at one local source, and overturned by a grassroots movement to take back the town, by...wait for it...VOTING!

      Lo and behold, here comes a politician you can vote for to save you from it!

      Special interests must be overjoyed with how Agenda 21's "exposure" and "opposition" has worked out. All they must do to survive is preserve the legitimacy of the system, a big part of which is keeping people showing up at the polls, and keeping them in the dark about the 100+ year history of the "deep state," which voting can't touch.

      Again, I'm not saying that Agenda 21 isn't evil, but maybe the most evil thing about it isn't its stated intention, but the polarization and distractions it generates?

      Delete
  2. Agenda 21 is neo-feudalism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That started with property taxes.
      Effectively government owns all land. Don't pay the rent and see what happens.

      Delete
  3. People will be accepting the mark of the beast in droves very soon.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Basically, those that hold to this form of radical environmentalism believe that humanity is utterly destroying the planet, and therefore the goal should be to create a world where literally everything that we do is tightly monitored and controlled by control freak bureaucrats in the name of “sustainable development”. In their vision of the future, the human population will be greatly reduced and human activity will be limited to strictly regulated urban areas and travel corridors. The rest of the planet will be left to nature. To achieve this goal, a massive transfer of land from private landowners to the federal government will be necessary."

    He just made 6 or 7 claims. Where's the evidence? And I don't want a link to Prison Planet. I want documents that show that those in power want to reduce the population, build corridors, etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It won't be blatantly written out like that.

      Remember how things work, the top just sets up the incentives and then people work towards those incentives. It snow balls, and next thing we know we are living in the world that was envisioned.

      But if we look at the obvious consequences of various policies being put into action, being pushed, etc together we can see agenda 21.

      For instance, have you seen the foundation funded anti-car movements that are shaping the tools of government to bring about a dense urban landscape for all people to live in?

      The best I can suggest is to listen to a Rosa Koire(sp?) lecture on agenda 21. Then just pay attention to things.

      Delete
    2. Who paid to create and erect the Georgia Guidestones (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones)? Who is Margaret Sanger and how are her ideological views relevant to the fact that she created Planned Parenthood? What is sacred geometry and why was Washington D.C. planned, developed, and constructed in the way that it was? Why does the music industry consistently employ masonic imagery in its message to the masses (www.vigilentcitizen.com)?

      Is it possible for a small cabal of individual to completely control the globe? Absolutely not. Human nature would dictate that the competing interests of the parties involved would at some point come into play (nevermind all of the incontrollable variables involved as well). Does it stop certain parties from trying to corner a market? Not a chance. When you start looking around, you realize pretty quickly that there are some very rich Malthusians that have some pretty warped view about what our collective future should look like. Are they going to come right out and say it? No. They didn't acquire all those resources by virtue of being stupid.

      Delete
    3. “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal,” ~ Ted Turner.

      This from a man who owns more land in the US than anyone else.

      Does that satisfy you Edward?

      Delete