Friday, May 16, 2014

At Least 6 Chinese Cities Had to Bail Out Their Real Estate Markets Last Month

By Simon Black

According to the Chinese financial publication Securities Daily, emergency real estate rescue packages have been launched in large cities such as Wuxi, Nanning, Hangzhou, Tianjin, Tongling and Zhengzhou in the last month alone.

"Zhengzhou created a mortgage guarantee policy to win back banks' confidence" according to the story.

Further, "if a borrower does not fulfill the loan repayment obligations as agreed in the contract, the guarantee institutions will have to repay the housing loans..."

What a surprise-- a government guarantee.

The market is imploding and defaults are going through the roof. Property vacancy rates in Zhengzhou are an astounding 23%. So the government is
putting taxpayers on the hook.

The article goes on: "A legislative affairs official of Zhengzhou revealed to the media that this was the first time for Zhengzhou to carry out such individual housing loans guarantee policy."

In other words, the government is panicking.

Home sales in China fell last month by 18%, in no small part due to tightening credit conditions.

Developers have tried to pick up the slack and liquidate inventory by offering no money down deals... their own desperation tactic.

But it's not working.

Over the May 1-3 holiday weekend, new home sales across China's 54 largest cities were 47% lower than last year.

The national government in China has all but capitulated, and they've turned the reins over to local governments to 'fix' the problem.

This has been a long time in the making.

According to data from the US Geological Survey and China's National Bureau of Statistics that was compiled by the Financial Times, in just two years (2011 and 2012), China produced more cement than the United States produced in the entire 20th century.

Much of this development came from centrally planned monster infrastructure projects-- bridges to nowhere, zombie train stations, and infamous ghost cities.

So much excess inventory has built up, a major slowdown was inevitable.

This is a huge issue for China given that housing sales comprised nearly 12% of GDP last year.

Even President Xi Jinping recently stated that his nation must adapt to a 'new normal' of slower economic growth.

And like the butterfly that flaps its wings, a slowdown in China has substantial effects on the rest of the world.

I'm seeing this first hand here in Chile; Chile is a huge copper producer, and under high growth conditions, China is a top consumer.

As China has slowed, its copper consumption has fallen. Copper prices have tanked.

Over the past few months, the Chilean peso has lost as much as 20% over its average in recent years. And I can see on the ground, all of this has adversely affected the Chilean economy.

But as I'm fond of writing, in every situation, there are winners and losers.

In this case, my team and I are seeing a lot of attractive deals for agricultural property.

What was once a seller's market just a few months ago is rapidly turning into a buyer's market as many indebted owners are dumping their properties. Many are in distress.

Yet due to the slowdown, there are fewer buyers in the market with cash in hand, and I've even seen several properties go to auction recently.

For foreign investors, this is a great situation to be in. And I expect that as China's slowdown continues to unfold, we'll see a lot more of these types of opportunities all around the world.

Simon Black is Senior Editor  at SovereignMan.com. Follow Sovereign Man on Facebook, Twitter, Google+

1 comment:

  1. The Italian Disaster

    Europe is ill. How seriously, and why, are matters not always easy to judge. But among the symptoms three are conspicuous, and inter-related. The first, and most familiar, is the degenerative drift of democracy across the continent, of which the structure of the EU is at once cause and consequence. The oligarchic cast of its constitutional arrangements, once conceived as provisional scaffolding for a popular sovereignty of supranational scale to come, has over time steadily hardened.Referendums are regularly overturned, if they cross the will of rulers. Voters whose views are scorned by elites shun the assembly that nominally represents them, turnout falling with each successive election. Bureaucrats who have never been elected police the budgets of national parliaments dispossessed even of spending powers. But the Union is not an excrescence on member states that might otherwise be healthy enough. It reflects, as much as it deepens, long-term trends within them. At national level, virtually everywhere, executives domesticate or manipulate legislatures with greater ease; parties lose members; voters lose belief that they count, as political choices narrow and promises of difference on the hustings dwindle or vanish in office.
    With this generalised involution has come a pervasive corruption of the political class, a topic on which political science, talkative enough on what in the language of accountants is termed the democratic deficit of the Union, typically falls silent. The forms of this corruption have yet to find a systematic taxonomy. There is pre-electoral corruption: the funding of persons or parties from illegal sources – or legal ones – against the promise, explicit or tacit, of future favours. There is post-electoral corruption: the use of office to obtain money by malversation of revenues, or kickbacks on contracts.
    http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n10/perry-anderson/the-italian-disaster

    ReplyDelete