The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings.
From the study:
The full study is here.
(ht Daily Caller)
Thursday, July 6, 2017
EXPLOSIVE: New Study Finds Recent Climate Warming Data 'Not a Valid Representation of Reality'
This is big. A new study has found that adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”
The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings.
(ht Daily Caller)
The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings.
(ht Daily Caller)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah
ReplyDeleteClearly Russia has hacked global warming.
ReplyDeleteWhat Tony Heller found years ago is now peer reviewed. This won't go over well with warmists.
ReplyDeleteIt will be marginalized and ignored. Facts are not effective against emotions (or self-interest). Environmentalism will persist the same as every other religion with believers.
Delete