Wednesday, May 30, 2018

Wilbur Ross Rips New Nightmare EU Privacy Laws



For once, U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross makes some economic sense. The European Union's new General Data Protection Regulation is a statist imposed horror and he is objecting.

From a Ross op-ed that appears today in the Financial Times:
We in the US are deeply concerned about the way the EU’s new privacy guidelines, which came into effect last week, will force big changes in the way US and European companies do business...

We believe that data-sharing rules must
respect privacy and protect our shared interests of maintaining public safety and the easy functioning of the internet, while also taking into account the regulatory, scientific, and commercial needs of all our countries. As currently envisioned, GDPR ’s implementation could significantly interrupt transatlantic co-operation and create unnecessary barriers to trade, not only for the US, but for everyone outside the EU.

The US thrives because it has an open, entrepreneurial society that encourages innovation and embraces technological advances. We believe consumers benefit because they enjoy the digital products and services that are invented and brought to market by US companies.

Complying with GDPR will exact a significant cost, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises and consumers who rely on digital services and may lose access and choice as a result of the guidelines. US companies have already invested billions of dollars to comply with the new rules. But even as companies update their privacy policies to bring themselves in line, many uncertainties remain.

GDPR creates serious, unclear legal obligations for both private and public sector entities, including the US government. We do not have a clear understanding of what is required to comply. That could disrupt transatlantic co-operation on financial regulation, medical research, emergency management co-ordination, and important commerce. It could threaten public welfare on both sides of the Atlantic...

Pharmaceutical companies may not be able to submit medical data from drug trials involving European patients to US authorities, which could delay the approval of new life-saving drugs. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention could be restricted in sharing information with European counterparts while responding to the outbreak of diseases such as Ebola. And the US Postal Service believes the new rules will prevent EU postal operators from providing the personal data on individuals it needs to process inbound mail.
But there is one positive. The GDPR appears to somewhat stifle U.S. attempts at being a global financial dictator and snoop. Ross sees this as a problem, but not me. he writes:
US and European financial services regulators may be impeded from carrying out important activities: for example, it is unclear whether EU supervisors can share information with the US for compliance exams and other oversight.

-RW  






2 comments:

  1. I don't get their jurisdiction. If some EU member connects over the internet with my server, suddenly my server is subject to EU laws? What if he telephones me, do EU hate peach laws apply to my conversation with him? What if he orders a product by telephone or postal letter? Do EU privacy laws apply to my disposition of the letter he sent to me? What if Japan passes laws that conflict with EU laws? Which do I comply with. What about Soviot laws, PROC laws, Yemen laws?

    I say: their laws apply to servers in their physical jurisdiction and no others. Let everyone move their hosting and ecommerce to good 'ol USA and enjoy freedom.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, the irony.

    "As currently envisioned, GDPR’s implementation could significantly interrupt transatlantic co-operation and create unnecessary barriers to trade ..."

    "Complying with GDPR will exact a significant cost, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises and consumers..."

    But the Trump tariffs and Iran sanctions do not?

    ReplyDelete