It was an odd phrase to use during a general television interview but there was nothing technically wrong with its use.
But Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who somehow gained a bachelor's degree in economics from Boston Univeristy (SEE: Boston University Economics Professors: "We Are Very Proud of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez") exploded at Hassett's perfectly sound use of the term.
The pro-tax economics professor at UC Berkeley, Gabriel Zucman, backed AOC up.Human Capital Stock.— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) May 26, 2020
An ugly term w ugly history, but for many powerful ppl it‘s their most honest view of workers: human stock.
By their logic, the moment a person stops being useful to profit motive (retirement, health, etc) they are a liability. That’s the system we live in. https://t.co/ZihhtaI00W
Phil Magness picks up the story from here with the six act play:
Act 1: Gabriel Zucman fires off a bunch of tweets claiming that the phrase "human capital stock" only makes sense in reference to slavery, thereby lending support to the AOC/Steinbaum claims of the last few days.
Act 2: A bunch of twitter users find lecture slides on Zucman's own website where he approvingly refers to the "stock of human capital" in its normal usage.
Act 3: Zucman alters the lecture slides on his website to hide his previous use of the term.
Act 4: Twitter users dig up an archive of the original text and show it's been altered in the last few hours.
Act 5: BadEconTakes tweets the whole series of events.
— Bad Econ Takes (@BadEconTakes) May 28, 2020
Act 6: Zucman lashes out at BadEconTakes and claims he's the victim of "bullying."
Please take note: The left plays by different rules whereby truth and reality are not necessary if it is a hindrance in an attack or to gain power.
-RW
No comments:
Post a Comment