That's right: The streaming sensation's next big move is to stream itself.
This will be the future: Live broadcasts, tweets and earnings press releases on company we sites. No need for PRnewswire or BusinessWire to do this work.
R.I.P., Jtf.
John Thomas Financial, the beleaguered Wall Street brokerage firm founded by celebrity broker Tommy Belesis, has fallen so far it’s now six feet under, The Post has learned.
The formerly high-flying brokerage firm, which once boasted attendants in its office bathroom and ties to famed film director Oliver Stone, filed termination requests with federal and state regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (Finra) and the Nasdaq Stock Market, records show.
In all, JTF filed a whopping 45 termination requests this week, according to Finra records.
The move caps the brokerage firm’s fast and furious demise following a litany of government probes, which were first reported by The Post in February.
In March, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Belesis and George Jarkesy, a Houston radio host, accusing them of deceiving investors of a hedge fund allegedly controlled by Belesis.
In April, Finra filed a complaint accusing Belesis of selling the brokerage firm’s shares ahead of clients and intimidating and harassing brokers.
Belesis, 38, has denied the allegations, as has Jarkesy.
Still, the allegations have taken their toll on the firm.
In June, the firm’s prized 38,705 square-foot office space on the 23rd floor of 14 Wall Street was put on the market.
Not long after, JTF’s clearing firm, Sterne Agee, sent a notice to JTF’s customers warning that the brokerage didn’t have enough capital to continue operating and was required to “suspend all business operations” until it could bring itself back into compliance.
Prior to JTF’s coming into the government’s crosshairs, Belesis was rubbing elbows with famous and powerful people, and regularly winning appearances on cable television.
In 2011, he was honored with the Manhattan GOP “Businessman of the Year Award” in a ceremony that included presidential hopeful Rick Perry. Two years earlier he was given a similar award by former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani.
Former CNN and FOX host Glenn Beck has called for commemorating the Muslim holy month of Ramadan by shooting everyone at Guantanamo Bay in the head, also joking about torturing others through forced-feeding. On his July 9th radio program, the 49-year-old Mormon GOP supporter was discussing hunger strikes and forced feeding of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. "We can't let them starve themselves to death? Damn right we can. We can also shoot them in the head, which is the other option and the one I'm for. SHOOT THEM. But, the other is let them starve to death and I'm totally fine with that," Beck insisted
That description could only apply to the Trayvon Martin killing, for which Zimmerman is currently on trial. The heated protests and national media attention helped build the pressure last year for Zimmeran’s arrest — he was not initially charged after claiming self-defense.
Sen. Rand Paul (R., Ky.) defended embattled aide Jack Hunter, whose past as a prominent pro-Confederate radio pundit was first reported by the Washington Free Beacon on Tuesday, even as the controversy threatened to unravel his recent outreach to the pro-Israel community.[...]
Hunter’s comments, in particular his suggestion that Paul’s pro-Israel remarks have been “little rhetorical concession[s]” and part of “play[ing] the game,” have reignited concerns that Paul’s occasional pro-Israel statements have not been genuine.
“I think it’s important for Rand Paul to make it clear that when Hunter made those statements he doesn’t speak for Rand Paul, and everything he said about Israel he will adhere to,” said Mort Klein, president of the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA).[...]
Hunter renounced most of his controversial positions in an interview with the Free Beacon on Monday, but declined to say directly that he no longer supports secession.
Klein said he could not accept an apology from Hunter.
“If someone has made numerous horrific statements, or ones that go way beyond the pale, applauding the assassination of Lincoln, one has to assume that’s who the person is and apologies made under political heat are not credible,” Klein said.
“I don’t accept Obama’s excuses for his friendships with haters, I don’t accept [Chuck] Hagel’s or [Samantha] Power’s apologies for their statements,” Klein added. “So I personally could not accept [Jack] Hunter now apologizing and dismissing these statements. He’s made too many and he’s made too many that are beyond the pale.”
Summers is said by those who know him to be in no way campaigning for the job, despite a recent flurry of stories about his potential nomination. His office said he was golfing with no access to a cellphone when POLITICO tried to reach him on Tuesday. People close to Summers say he has settled into his current teaching role at Harvard and is not especially eager to move back to Washington full time.
But others say if Obama asks, Summers would certainly agree to serve.
Until World War II and the postwar years, when the federal bureaucracy institutionalized the government’s preferred method for calculating national income, economists offered sound arguments for excluding government spending from estimates of gross domestic product. Using their general approach reveals that the private economy’s performance for the past thirteen years has been only somewhat better than complete stagnation.Higgs concludes:
As the basic Keynesian model implies, the recent increases in government spending appear to haveprevented an even greater decline in real GDP during the recession that began in the winter of 2007–2008. However that may be, because so much of this spending may have had little or no value—or even negative value—in itself, the question remains as to whether, despite what the official GDP figures show, the population’s true economic well-being might have suffered a greater contraction than mainstream economists, journalists, policymakers, and others for the most part believe. To resolve this question, I have computed what I call real “gross domestic private product” (GDPP), which is simply the standard real GDP minus the government purchases part of it. Figure 1 shows the movement of this variable from 2000 to 2012, the most recently completed year. If real GDPP had grown at its long-run average rate of about 3 percent per year during the period from 2000 to 2012, it would have increased by about 43 percent. In reality, however, real GDPP increased during this period by only 22 percent or by about 1.7 percent per year on average. So during this period of more than a decade, private product grew at only slightly more than half of its historical average rate. Between 2002 and 2007, while the housing bubble was giving rise to seemingly buoyant growth even beyond the housing sector, the good times appeared to have returned, but the inevitable bust from 2007 to 2009 and the slow recovery since 2009 pulled the intermediate-run growth rate for 2000–2012 back to an anemic level. The recovery of the period 2009–12 brought real GDPP up to a level only 3 percent above its 2007 level, signifying five years in which almost no net gain had been made and much suffering had occurred between the beginning and the end of the period. Perhaps the most positive statement we can make about the private economy’s performance during this thirteen-year period is that it has been somewhat better than complete stagnation.[...]
[T]he federal government’s huge run-up in its spending and debt; the Fed’s great expansion of bank reserves, its allocation of credit directly to failing companies and struggling sectors, and its accommodation of the federal government’s gigantic deficits; and the federal government’s enactment of extremely unsettling regulatory statutes, especially Obamacare and the Dodd-Frank Act—have served to discourage the private investment needed to hasten the recovery and lay the foundation for more rapid economic growth in the long run. To find a similar perfect storm of counterproductive government fiscal, monetary, and regulatory policies, we must go back to the 1930s, when the measures taken under Herbert Hoover and Franklin D. Roosevelt turned what probably would have been an ordinary, short-lived recession into the Great Depression (Higgs 1987, 159–95; 2006, 3–29). If the government and the Fed persist in the kind of destructive policies they have undertaken since 2007, the potential for another great depression will remain. Even without such a catastrophe, the U.S. economy presents at best the prospect of weak performance for many years to come.