Europe and Japan Officially in Recessions

From The Independent: It's official: eurozone collapses into its first recession:

Europe's economy officially collapsed into recession for the first time since its inception during the third quarter ... The eurozone, made up of the 15 countries that use the euro as their primary currency, shrank by 0.2 percentage points between July and the end of September, having contracted by the same margin during the preceding three months as well. ...

Germany and Italy, the continent's largest and fourth largest economies, dragged the eurozone down – both slipped into recession during the third quarter. Spain also suffered its first quarter of negative growth in 15 years. However, France just managed to maintain a positive growth rate.

From Bloomberg: Japan's Economy Shrinks 0.4%, Confirming Recession:

Japan's economy, the world's second largest, contracted more than economists expected in the third quarter, confirming it entered its first recession since 2001 as companies cut back spending.

Gross domestic product fell an annualized 0.4 percent in the three months ended Sept. 30 ...

The United States has not yet been officially declared in recession, Jeffrey Frankel who directs the program in International Finance and Macroeconomics at the National Bureau of Economic Research, where he is also a member of the Business Cycle Dating Committee, says:

The weight of evidence is now overwhelming: We are currently in recession.

It's (Almost) An Official Recession

Jeffrey Frankel directs the program in International Finance and Macroeconomics at the National Bureau of Economic Research, where he is also a member of the Business Cycle Dating Committee. The committee is the deliberative body that officially declares recessions. He writes:

The weight of evidence is now overwhelming: We are currently in recession.

His full analysis is here. Notice how he looks at data, unemployment, GDP etc., to see what is going up and what is going down, but says nothing about a business cycle and what might cause an economic downturn. Notice, further, how he is totally befuddled by the strength in the economy earlier this year:

The rate of change of real GDP, surprisingly, was above zero in the first quarter of 2008, and was even moderately strong in the second quarter: 2.8%. (The revised “final” estimate of GDP in the fourth quarter of 2007 did turn out to be below zero, but just barely.) It is quite a mystery why output pointed up during the first half of the year, while everything else pointed down.

And although a version of money supply, "real" money supply is one of the leading economic indicators, there is no mention, by Frankel, as to dating a recession when Bernanke first slammed the breaks on money growth earlier this year. That would explain why GDP just turned down in Q3, before that it was just a sector specific regulatory downturn.

A member of the group that dates the beginning and end of recessions doesn't have a business cycle theory, for him it is just data falling from the sky. Amazing. Even more amazing is that most other members of the Business Cycle Dating Committee are probably just as uninformed.