Oh yeah, Krugman responded, here.
There are two things to note about this "response".
1. Krugman fails to link to Schiff's actual video. I think he knows he doesn't have answers for Schiff's attack.
2. What Krugman does do is link to a Google search of Schiff's hyper-inflation warnings and then point to a chart that shows the inflation hasn't started yet.
This is the most absurd argument I have ever seen. It is Krugman posing rather than answering the charges that Schiff raises. Answer me this, Paul baby, how is this different from linking to a Google search of Schiff's warnings about the real estate collapse, just before the collapse started, and pointing to a chart that shows housing prices going up, up and away? Would this, at that time, somehow prove that Schiff was wrong about the real estate collapse? Forgive me, Paul, but this isn't argument by you it is, I'll say it again, trailer trash posing by a guy with a half fried brain an misisng teeth, who has a beer in a paper bag as he pontificates to a guy with a three-quarters fried brain.
Be a man, Paul
Link to Schiff's video and take it apart piece by piece, if you can. Show us what your mind is made of.
Bottom line, as Bob Murphy points out, who sent me the link to Krugman's piece:
Krugman sets himself up to be another "famous pundit who ridiculed Peter Schiff just a bit too early..."