Saturday, March 20, 2010

Mankiw Warns on CBO Healthcare Budget Numbers

Greg Mankiw reports on one convention the CBO uses that to distorts the CBO budget projections surrounding Obamacare:
There has been a lot of talk lately about the CBO scoring of the health bill. Here is one thing people should understand about their numbers: When they estimate the budget impact of a bill like this, they assume the path of GDP is unchanged.

Recall that the bill raises taxes substantially. Some of these tax hikes are the explicit tax increases on capital income to pay for the insurance subsidies. Some of these tax hikes are the implicit marginal rate increases from the phase-out of the insurance subsidies as a person's income rises. Both of these would be expected to reduce GDP growth.

Indeed, to be very wonkish about it, these tax changes could have especially large GDP effects. Some people like to argue that taxes have small GDP effects because income and substitution effects offset each other. But if you give someone a subsidy and then phase it out, both the income and substitution effects work in the direction of reducing work effort.

Why does CBO assume no change in GDP? It is not because the CBO staffers necessarily believe that result. Rather, it is just one of the conventions of budget scoring. Their estimates should with a warning label:
There are enough distortions and lies surrounding Obamacare to make one sick. It will eventually reduce healthcare in America and further add to the decline of the empire.

1 comment:

  1. 3/21/10 Audit the Fed? Are you serious? Am I amongst the very few that are cognizant that the Federal Reserve IS NOT a U.S. government agency (it is not Federal and there are no reserves) but a very closely held, FOREIGN owned bank corporation? Let's not waste the taxpayers money on auditing the Fed: let's abolish the Fed altogether and return to what our wise forefathers had envisioned for this country: Congress be delegated the responsibilty of regulating the "coinage" of money.