You know if I wasn't so cynical I'd almost think Paul is an intellectually consistent politician who at first opportunity doesn't fall back on dissembling and weasel words.
A fox knows what he does, that is why he is smarter than the chickens. Ambush or not, the old fox knows what is coming. The MSM bull shitters cannot outwit the sly one. O'reilly is a blathering puppet and Dr.Paul can shut him down every time and they know it. Sane American people of principle know this and this is what the MSM fears, more educated and thinking masses.
That is a shortened clip that misses the subsequent chatter:
"O'REILLY: All right. Here now is Jesse Watters. Now, I have read the Constitution, and it doesn't say anything about gold and silver. What is he talking about?
WATTERS: No, he is misreading the Constitution. And this theory of his has been around for quite some time. It's just not taken very seriously in most circles. Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution says Congress has the ability to coin money and regulate the currency and doesn't say anything about gold or silver.
O'REILLY: Gold or silver, right.
WATTERS: And what I think he is saying is that Article 10 does not allow the states to print money. And that's just because you don't want to have Massachusetts having one currency and New York having another.
O'REILLY: Right.
WATTERS: That's chaos.
O'REILLY: Right.
WATTERS: And he's misinterpreting that."
http://tinyurl.com/4xc8gob
According to O'Reilly last night, Ron Paul is AFRAID to go "The Factor" because he won't be able to answer the tough questions he will be asked.
I didn't really have an opinion of Bill O'Reilly before this. As a result of O'Reilly's question I now see he is a deceitful ignoramus.
"O'REILLY: ...I have read the Constitution, and it doesn't say anything about gold and silver...
Section. 10.
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;
If he cannot see that - and understand the language and the meaning of the statement - then there's no way he could come up with a definition of money.
If I asked Bill O'Reilly, "What is money?"
He would likely reply, "Duh, I dunno know"
Section. 9.
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law;
Watters was a prick and his economics ignorance was remarkable. RP was trying to be polite with the O'Reilly turd polisher. The Media just continues to be creepier each day.
The smirk was really annoying, but I don't know that it was an ambush per se. The guy at least let Paul speak, much more finish without interrupting him or shouting him down as O'Really does on his program. Which is why I consider O'R's ignorance the least of his problems, contra Paul's closing remark. Obviously I'm no fan of OR, but neither am I a fanboy of RP. OR generally behaves rather boorishly, unless he's interviewing somebody like Jon "Laughtrack Liebowitz" Stuart who can put him in his place.
Ron paul sure smacked down O Reilly and his little attack boy.
By the way, Wenzel, in honor of O reilly's attacks on Paul, how about we bring up the story of O Reilly having to settle for millions of dollars a couple years ago in a sexual harassment case? It was a sick, sick case. O reilly is a creepy guy who reportedly did some nasty things that would probably make Bill Clinton blush. If that clown wants to play hardball, then we will show him how it is done.
Obama is an unprincipled, power-hungry politician with socialist leanings -- i.e., he is like every other politician except Ron Paul. Obama's supporters know nothing about economics or the philosophy of liberty.
Meanwhile, Ron Paul consistently defends the philosophy of liberty and sound economics in the face of constant attacks and ridicule. Therefore, I greatly respect the man. If that makes me a Paul drone, then so be it.
Let's put up a remind of the sex pervert O reilly's shady past and multi-million dollar settlement. I think a lot of the supposed evangelical christians who take him seriously need to be reminded about what kind of a perv he really is!
what a little punk snot that kid was. i'd like to hurl him into the sea. him and his grin. he's pretty much exactly what is wrong with this country. he should enlighten himself, turn off the tv, and read a book. starting with the constitution. then maybe something like murray rothbard. but paul's probably right, he wouldn't get it. i'm wasting my time.
LoL!
ReplyDeleteYou know if I wasn't so cynical I'd almost think Paul is an intellectually consistent politician who at first opportunity doesn't fall back on dissembling and weasel words.
Oh EPJ, it wasn't an ambush. You guys hype every Ron Paul moment as a great something. You guys are turning into 2008 Obama Drones.
ReplyDeleteA fox knows what he does, that is why he is smarter than the chickens. Ambush or not, the old fox knows what is coming. The MSM bull shitters cannot outwit the sly one. O'reilly is a blathering puppet and Dr.Paul can shut him down every time and they know it. Sane American people of principle know this and this is what the MSM fears, more educated and thinking masses.
ReplyDeleteOh this is perfect. I love, "he wouldn't have understood it!" So true.
ReplyDeleteThat is a shortened clip that misses the subsequent chatter:
ReplyDelete"O'REILLY: All right. Here now is Jesse Watters. Now, I have read the Constitution, and it doesn't say anything about gold and silver. What is he talking about?
WATTERS: No, he is misreading the Constitution. And this theory of his has been around for quite some time. It's just not taken very seriously in most circles. Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution says Congress has the ability to coin money and regulate the currency and doesn't say anything about gold or silver.
O'REILLY: Gold or silver, right.
WATTERS: And what I think he is saying is that Article 10 does not allow the states to print money. And that's just because you don't want to have Massachusetts having one currency and New York having another.
O'REILLY: Right.
WATTERS: That's chaos.
O'REILLY: Right.
WATTERS: And he's misinterpreting that."
http://tinyurl.com/4xc8gob
According to O'Reilly last night, Ron Paul is AFRAID to go "The Factor" because he won't be able to answer the tough questions he will be asked.
Anon up there is 'Anon' for a reason. If it wasn't an ambush then why did the reporter keep asking "what do you want to do with gold"
ReplyDelete"ugh, wait, but what would you do with gold?"
really, you don't see what's going on there?
Re: Obama Drones
ReplyDeleteOh get over yourself! That kids was a smug douche with that stupid smirk! He didn't understand a word Paul said either!
Boy, that Walters fellow is really annoying, isn't he?
ReplyDeleteNo doubt, danny. It was quite obvious.
ReplyDeleteI didn't really have an opinion of Bill O'Reilly before this. As a result of O'Reilly's question I now see he is a deceitful ignoramus.
"O'REILLY: ...I have read the Constitution, and it doesn't say anything about gold and silver...
Section. 10.
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;
If he cannot see that - and understand the language and the meaning of the statement - then there's no way he could come up with a definition of money.
If I asked Bill O'Reilly, "What is money?"
He would likely reply, "Duh, I dunno know"
Section. 9.
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law;
- clark
Watters was a prick and his economics ignorance was remarkable. RP was trying to be polite with the O'Reilly turd polisher. The Media just continues to be creepier each day.
ReplyDeleteThe smirk was really annoying, but I don't know that it was an ambush per se. The guy at least let Paul speak, much more finish without interrupting him or shouting him down as O'Really does on his program. Which is why I consider O'R's ignorance the least of his problems, contra Paul's closing remark. Obviously I'm no fan of OR, but neither am I a fanboy of RP. OR generally behaves rather boorishly, unless he's interviewing somebody like Jon "Laughtrack Liebowitz" Stuart who can put him in his place.
ReplyDeleteRon paul sure smacked down O Reilly and his little attack boy.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, Wenzel, in honor of O reilly's attacks on Paul, how about we bring up the story of O Reilly having to settle for millions of dollars a couple years ago in a sexual harassment case? It was a sick, sick case. O reilly is a creepy guy who reportedly did some nasty things that would probably make Bill Clinton blush. If that clown wants to play hardball, then we will show him how it is done.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7578-2004Oct28.html
ReplyDeleteIf O reilly didn't sexually harass this woman, why did he pay her well over 2 million dollars to go away??????
RE: Obama drones
ReplyDeleteObama is an unprincipled, power-hungry politician with socialist leanings -- i.e., he is like every other politician except Ron Paul. Obama's supporters know nothing about economics or the philosophy of liberty.
Meanwhile, Ron Paul consistently defends the philosophy of liberty and sound economics in the face of constant attacks and ridicule. Therefore, I greatly respect the man. If that makes me a Paul drone, then so be it.
Let's put up a remind of the sex pervert O reilly's shady past and multi-million dollar settlement. I think a lot of the supposed evangelical christians who take him seriously need to be reminded about what kind of a perv he really is!
ReplyDeletewhat a little punk snot that kid was. i'd like to hurl him into the sea. him and his grin. he's pretty much exactly what is wrong with this country. he should enlighten himself, turn off the tv, and read a book. starting with the constitution. then maybe something like murray rothbard. but paul's probably right, he wouldn't get it. i'm wasting my time.
ReplyDelete