Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Excerpts from Rand Paul's Tea Party Response to the State of the Union Address

Below are a few excerpts anticipated from Sen. Paul’s Tea Party response to the State of the Union Address, provided by his office. More text will be available closer to the delivery of the speech, which will be broadcast at approximately 10:45 p.m. ET.:
o We are the party that embraces hard work and ingenuity, therefore we must be the party that embraces the immigrant who wants to come to America for a better future. We must be the party who sees immigrants as assets, not liabilities. We must be the party that says, 'If you want to work, if you want to become an American, we welcome you.’

o The path we are on is not sustainable, but few in Congress or in this Administration seem to recognize that their actions are endangering the prosperity of this great nation.

o Both parties have been guilty of spending too much, of protecting their sacred cows, of backroom deals in which everyone up here wins, but every taxpayer loses. It is time for a new bipartisan consensus. It is time Democrats admit that not every dollar spent on domestic programs is sacred. And it is time Republicans realize that military spending is not immune to waste and fraud.

o Not only should the sequester stand, many pundits say the sequester really needs to be at least $4 trillion to avoid another downgrade of America's credit rating. Both parties will have to agree to cut, or we will never fix our fiscal mess.

o Washington acts in a way that your family never could – they spend money they do not have, they borrow from future generations, and then they blame each other for never fixing the problem.

o If Congress refuses to obey its own rules, if Congress refuses to pass a budget, if Congress refuses to read the bills, then I say: Sweep the place clean. Limit their terms and send them home!

1 comment:

  1. What is the obsession with immigration and Republicans? The 1990s version of the Rothbard/Hoppian position is quite restrictionist--equating forced immigration to trespassing, yet Republicans lead with it, from the opposing side, with nothing to gain for it.

    If a corporation wants to hire a work force, pay, house, feed and provide, so long as they don't have voting privileges, I get that, but why is Rand needlessly being so boilerplate on immigration? His vanilla foreign policy statements at least are (cynically) nuanced, but his immigration position is just standard Grahmnesty/Rubio/McAmnesty.