Newly obtained video that was reluctantly released by NIST after a lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies shows two firefighters on 9/11 discussing how secondary explosions occurred immediately before the collapse of the twin towers, providing damning new evidence that explosive devices were used to bring down the buildings. Firemen discuss how bombs were going off in the lobby of WTC1 as they were staging to move up the building. They explain how the building had already been hit by the plane and fires were already burning. After two explosions in the lobby, a third went off and the whole lobby collapsed. I’m sorry 9/11 truth deniers, you now have another smoking gun that you can’t deny!
Sunday, July 28, 2013
NEWLY OBTAINED VIDEO: 9/11 Firefighters Reveal Bombs Destroyed WTC lobby
Black Listed News reports:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Reminds me of the OKC bombing. Police, etc., were reporting that additional explosives were being disarmed and removed from the remaining support pillars, during the first hour or two after the explosion. Oddly, all mention of those additional explosives disappeared after the official story was established.
ReplyDeleteThat video has been out awhile. I think it was included in the movie "Loose Change".
ReplyDeleteThe one firefighter says a black plane flew in to the building. How many commercial airliners are totally black?
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, eyewitness accounts are unreliable at best. They do not form a sufficient basis to believe that the towers were brought down by bombs. Consider, for example, that there are uncountable eyewitnesses who claim to have witnessed miracles (magic powers) by Sathya Sai Baba.
ReplyDeleteWe need corroborating evidence.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThere is plenty of corroborating evidence. See Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth... Furthermore, interpreting magic tricks as miracles is in no way similar to witnessing explosions that lead to a lobby falling down on your head. There were actually people killed by the explosions in the lobby. Unfortunately, MEDIA and GOVERNMENT accounts do not form a sufficient basis to believe the towers collapsed due to fire, into their own footprint, at free-fall speed, through the path of greatest resistance.
DeleteWhat was going on that day in the airways or air space? Because if they wanted to bring down the buildings alone, why didn't they just put bombs in their and simply say the terrorists planted necessary size bombs at correct locations under the guise of security or whatever would make it possible for them to do such a thing?
DeleteWhy use the excuse of airliners bringing it down?
You might want to look to the stock market for who made BIG money on the airlines. Follow the money!
DeleteThat video and other of firefighters who heard explosions have been around for a while. If people manage to ignore WTC 7, that there was a NORAD drill on the exact same scenario that same morning, that they were unprepared to defend the pentagon 80 minutes after the first attack, etc., then this video wont sway them much.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I'm curious if Robert has any insight on the heavy insider trading on put options for United, AA, and IIRC Salamon Smith Barney. The 9/11 report glossed over it like it was no big deal. Seems to me that there is no way a real investigator would let that go.
Lysander
I sure do have more on the options trading.
Deletehttp://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2010/06/destruction-of-9-11-options-trading.html
Couldn't it be terrorists also planted bombs in the building in addition to flying planes into it?
ReplyDeleteRobert,
ReplyDeleteI think you're missing the point there. These two guys are BRILLIANT. You need to interview them on your show. They were the first 9/11 conspiracy theorists! The dust hadn't even settled [pun intended] and they already were making up stories of bombs and stuff like that. BRILLIANT!!! They even went so far as to hit each other in the face, you know show some blood, to make the story even more convincing. I love these guys. I think Alex Jones was pretty quick on the conspiracy bandwagon (no surprise there). They beat him by hours! But, really, it's the speed with which they seized the opportunity that's most impressive. I mean, even on the drive to the building they must have been saying something like, "Look, Fred (name made up), not everyone's gonna believe the official story. If we make up this one about bombs, today, right now, we're gonna be famous. Let's get all dirty, maybe a bit of blood, then go find us a TV reporter. We'll get in on the ground floor of the whole conspiracy industry."
Yep, I bet that's what these guys were thinking. Brilliant. Again, get them on your show!!!
They didn't say anything about a bomb anywhere in that video. They mentioned explosions, which could be caused by a number of things when there's a freaken plane stuck in the building.
ReplyDeleteWTC 7 collapsed with sudden onset of free fall acceleration. That means all the building's potential energy was converted to kinetic energy. Which means there was no energy available to do the work of buckling the columns as required by NIST's fire-induced collapse hypothesis. Just one example of how NIST's hypothesis is falsifiable. The NIST report is scientific fraud, period.
ReplyDeletewhats the ID on these firemen? We need to establish their names and confirm their identity. 9/11 was a demolition of the Constitution, and an "inside job."
ReplyDelete