Saturday, May 9, 2015

Richard Thaler's Dumb Students

The evil nudger, Richard Thaler, writes today in NYT:
Early in my teaching career I managed to get most of the students in my class mad at me. A midterm exam caused the problem.

I wanted the exam to sort out the stars, the average Joes and the duds, so it had to be hard and have a wide dispersion of scores. I succeeded in writing such an exam, but when the students got their results they were in an uproar. Their principal complaint was that the average score was only 72 points out of 100.

What was odd about this reaction was that I had already explained that the average numerical score on the exam had absolutely no effect on the distribution of letter grades. We employed a curve in which the average grade was a B+, and only a tiny number of students received grades below a C. I told the class this, but it had no effect on the students’ mood. They still hated my exam, and they were none too happy with me either. As a young professor worried about keeping my job, I wasn’t sure what to do.

Economic View
A column that explores life through an economic lens with leading economists and writers.
Andreessen Horowitz, Deal Maker to the Stars of Silicon Valley MAY 1
Economists Actually Agree on This: The Wisdom of Free Trade APR 24
Why Americans Don’t Want to Soak the Rich APR 17
Why a Harvard Professor Has Mixed Feelings When Students Take Jobs in Finance APR 10
It’s Not the Inequality; It’s the Immobility APR 3
See More »

Finally, an idea occurred to me. On the next exam, I raised the points available for a perfect score to 137. This exam turned out to be harder than the first. Students got only 70 percent of the answers right but the average numerical score was 96 points. The students were delighted!

I chose 137 as a maximum score for two reasons. First, it produced an average well into the 90s, and some students scored above 100, generating a reaction approaching ecstasy. Second, because dividing by 137 is not easy to do in your head, I figured that most students wouldn’t convert their scores into percentages.

Striving for full disclosure, in subsequent years I included this statement in my course syllabus: “Exams will have a total of 137 points rather than the usual 100. This scoring system has no effect on the grade you get in the course, but it seems to make you happier.” And, indeed, after I made that change, I never got a complaint that my exams were too hard.

1 comment:

  1. Wow! Both LaDonne and Thaler are perfect examples of the failed education system. Rather than respond to angry and unhappy students with continued explanations and informative instruction you both chose to obfuscate with adjustments to your grading methods. How clever!! Unfortunately the education system has been reduced to a popularity contest where learning and exchange of information has become secondary. My suggestion to students is to escape this system and get a job as soon as possible where they can build something for themselves by responding to the needs and wants of their fellow humans.