Test Yourself: Are You Being Tricked by Intuition? http://t.co/IMLQYSXCd4
— Harvard Biz Review (@HarvardBiz) April 2, 2015
Not that tough. Think!
Test Yourself: Are You Being Tricked by Intuition? http://t.co/IMLQYSXCd4
— Harvard Biz Review (@HarvardBiz) April 2, 2015
If there is anything that economists of nearly all schools agree upon, it is the folly of minimum wage laws...We cannot make a man worth a given amount by making it illegal foe anyone to offer him less. We merely deprive him of the right to earn the amount that his abilities and opportunities will permit him to earn, while we deprive the the community even of the moderate services he is capable of rendering.
[B]itcoin usage has been stagnant lately, with its worth plummeting.
![]() |
| Own the penthouse under construction at Lumina for just $49 million. |
For the first study, the students watched a 15-minute TED talk and took notes on it, then took a test on it half an hour afterward. Some of the test questions were straightforward, asking for a particular figure or fact, while others were conceptual, and asked students to compare or analyze ideas.
The two groups of students — laptop users and hand-writers — did pretty similarly on the factual questions. But the laptop users did significantly worse on the conceptual ones:
The problem appears to be that the laptop turns students into stenographers, people who write down everything they hear as quickly as they can. Students who take handwritten notes, however, try to process the material as they are writing it down so that they only have to write down the key ideas. Forcing the brain to extract the most vital information is actually when the learning happens.The laptops resulted in worse learning even under the study conditions when they were actually used to take notes. In the real world, the laptops are a tempting distraction. I am reminded of the day my son came to my class. He sat in the back and afterwards he said “Dad, I can see why you are so interested in online education. Half of your students are online during your class already.”(via Alex Tabarrok)
Dear Bob,This month “Liberty Matters,” the discussion forum for “matters pertaining to liberty,” that is part of the “Online Library of Liberty” run by Liberty Fund of Indianapolis, is featuring my essay, “Assessing Böhm-Bawerk’s Contribution to Economics After a Hundred Years.”I explain the life, ideas and economic contributions of the leading, early Austrian economist, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk. Famous for his development of the “Austrian” theory of capital and interest, he also was one of the leading critics of Karl Marx and his theory of capitalist exploitation of workers.He also restated, refined and improved the theory of marginal utility and price formation first formulated by Carl Menger, the founder of the Austrian School. In this context, he was a critic of interventionist policies interfering with market-based prices and wagesLess well known is that he also several times served as the finance minister of the old Austro-Hungarian Empire under the Hapsburg emperor, Franz Joseph. Especially during his four-year stint as finance minister from 1900-1904, he followed a strict fiscal policy of limited taxation and restrained government spending, while defending the gold standard and resisting attempts to introduce Keynesian-type public works “stimulus” projects.The format of the “Liberty Matters” series is that after the posting of my “lead essay” summarizing and discussing Böhm-Bawerk’s life and work on April 1, a week later there will be posted “response essays” by Dr. Roger Garrison (Auburn University); Dr. Peter Lewin (University of Texas at Dallas) and Dr. Joseph Salerno (Lubin School of Business, Pace University).After which I will have the opportunity to respond to their commentaries, and then an open discussion will follow among the participants.Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk was one of the great economists of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and one of the fountainheads of modern Austrian Economics. Anyone interested in the “Austrian” tradition, and its insights for understanding the free market competitive process, will find, I think, this month’s “Liberty Matters” discussion valuable and worth following.Best,Richard